Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill increases authorized appropriations for implementing the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement. It raises the amounts in Section 10009 of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act from $250,000,000 to $750,000,000 for each cited subsection, and increases the Friant Division improvements authorization in Section 10203(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 from $50,000,000 to $75,000,000.
Left emphasizes ecological and tribal restoration benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused amendment to existing statutes that clearly and specifically increases authorized funding levels but does not include appropriation, implementation scheduling, oversight, or budgetary analysis.
This bill increases authorized appropriations for implementing the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement.
It raises the amounts in Section 10009 of the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act from $250,000,000 to $750,000,000 for each cited subsection, and increases the Friant Division improvements authorization in Section 10203(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 from $50,000,000 to $75,000,000.
The bill authorizes higher spending levels but does not itself appropriate funds or specify detailed allocation schedules.
Technocratic and narrow but increases discretionary spending; likely to advance only if attached to larger appropriations or compromise vehicles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused amendment to existing statutes that clearly and specifically increases authorized funding levels but does not include appropriation, implementation scheduling, oversight, or budgetary analysis.
Left emphasizes ecological and tribal restoration benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes ecological and tribal restoration benefits
Likely broadly supportive because the increase would enable fuller river and habitat restoration, support salmon recovery, and help meet settlement obligations to tribes.
Would want strict assurances that funds prioritize ecological outcomes, disadvantaged communities, and tribal needs.
Cautiously supportive if accompanied by clear oversight and phased funding tied to milestones.
Sees practical value in completing the settlement while wanting fiscal controls and timetable clarity.
Likely skeptical of increasing federal authorization levels, viewing it as expanded federal spending and potential interference with local water users.
Might support limited Friant infrastructure funding if strict protections for water deliveries and cost‑sharing apply.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic and narrow but increases discretionary spending; likely to advance only if attached to larger appropriations or compromise vehicles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes ecological and tribal restoration benefits
Technocratic and narrow but increases discretionary spending; likely to advance only if attached to larger appropriations or compromise veh…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused amendment to existing statutes that clearly and specifically increases authorized funding levels but does not include appropriation, implementat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.