Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
The bill repeals Section 136 of the Clean Air Act, which establishes a methane emissions and waste reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems. It also rescinds any unobligated balances previously made available under that section as of the day before enactment.
Climate mitigation versus regulatory relief for oil and gas
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a clear substantive action—repealing 42 U.S.C. 7436 and rescinding unobligated balances—but provides minimal implementation scaffolding beyond the repeal itself.
The bill repeals Section 136 of the Clean Air Act, which establishes a methane emissions and waste reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems.
It also rescinds any unobligated balances previously made available under that section as of the day before enactment.
Very narrow and administratively simple but ideologically polarizing; likely to stall where broader consensus required.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a clear substantive action—repealing 42 U.S.C. 7436 and rescinding unobligated balances—but provides minimal implementation scaffolding beyond the repeal itself.
Climate mitigation versus regulatory relief for oil and gas
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Climate mitigation versus regulatory relief for oil and gas
Likely strongly opposed.
Repealing a methane emissions incentive program removes federal tools to cut potent greenhouse gas emissions and cancels funding intended for reduction activities.
They would view this as a rollback of climate mitigation and public health protections.
Mixed view.
Appreciates reducing potentially duplicative regulatory costs but worries about the environmental and reputational consequences.
Would seek cost-benefit analysis, clarity on fiscal impacts, and safeguards to avoid higher emissions or legal exposure.
Likely supportive.
Views repeal as removing an unnecessary federal program or 'tax' on natural gas producers, reducing federal overreach and regulatory burden, and supporting domestic energy production and market flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow and administratively simple but ideologically polarizing; likely to stall where broader consensus required.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Climate mitigation versus regulatory relief for oil and gas
Very narrow and administratively simple but ideologically polarizing; likely to stall where broader consensus required.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a clear substantive action—repealing 42 U.S.C. 7436 and rescinding unobligated balances—but provides minimal implementation scaffolding beyond the repeal its…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.