S. 1438 (119th)Bill Overview

Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to treat periods disregarded for disasters (under section 7508A) as extensions of time for filing for purposes of refund/credit limitation rules and to require that collection-notice payment deadlines reflect those disregarded disaster periods. Amendments to sections 6511(b)(2)(A) and 6303(b) apply to claims or notices filed/issued after enactment.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize taxpayer relief and fairness for disaster victims.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies the statutory provisions to be changed and supplies concrete operative language and effective dates.

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to treat periods disregarded for disasters (under section 7508A) as extensions of time for filing for purposes of refund/credit limitation rules and to require that collection-notice payment deadlines reflect those disregarded disaster periods.

Amendments to sections 6511(b)(2)(A) and 6303(b) apply to claims or notices filed/issued after enactment.

Passage60/100

Narrow, technical, low-controversy tax code fix with minimal fiscal impact; main barrier is procedural floor access or needing inclusion in a larger legislative vehicle.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies the statutory provisions to be changed and supplies concrete operative language and effective dates. It integrates directly with existing code sections and leaves operational implementation to the IRS under the amended statutory language.

Contention30/100

Progressives emphasize taxpayer relief and fairness for disaster victims.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
TaxpayersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • TaxpayersPrevents taxpayers in disaster areas from losing refunds or credits because filing periods were disregarded.
  • Potential benefitReduces issuance of premature or erroneous collection notices after disaster-related postponements.
  • Potential benefitClarifies deadline calculations for tax administration, potentially reducing disputes and appeals.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesMay delay federal revenue collection and temporarily affect government cash flow after disasters.
  • Potential burdenRequires IRS to modify systems and procedures, increasing administrative workload and implementation costs.
  • Potential burdenCould create ambiguity or expanded eligibility, complicating uniform application across jurisdictions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize taxpayer relief and fairness for disaster victims.
Progressive90%

Likely views the bill favorably as a straightforward taxpayer relief measure for disaster-affected people.

It corrects a timing mismatch that could unfairly bar refunds and stops collection notices from ignoring disaster-related postponements.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Viewed as a narrow, pragmatic fix to align tax deadlines with disaster postponements.

Supports clarity and fairness but will want confirmation of modest fiscal and administrative impact.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

May accept the bill as a limited, targeted administrative accommodation for disaster victims, but holds concerns about collection effectiveness and potential abuse.

Support depends on assurances it won't expand executive discretion or reduce overall enforcement.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, technical, low-controversy tax code fix with minimal fiscal impact; main barrier is procedural floor access or needing inclusion in a larger legislative vehicle.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO score or fiscal estimate provided
  • Whether it will be packaged into larger tax or disaster legislation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize taxpayer relief and fairness for disaster victims.

Narrow, technical, low-controversy tax code fix with minimal fiscal impact; main barrier is procedural floor access or needing inclusion in…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies the statutory provisions to be changed and supplies concrete operativ…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis