- Federal agenciesMaintains federal authorities for emergency industrial mobilization and prioritization without interruption.
- Potential benefitSupports continuity of defense and critical-supply chains by avoiding legal gaps.
- Potential benefitProvides predictability for contractors and suppliers subject to DPA orders.
A bill to extend certain authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
This bill amends section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to change the expiration date from September 30, 2025, to September 30, 2026, extending the listed DPA authorities for one additional year.
Liberal emphasizes equity and climate-directed DPA uses.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted procedural/housekeeping measure that precisely amends a single statutory date to extend existing authority.
This bill amends section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to change the expiration date from September 30, 2025, to September 30, 2026, extending the listed DPA authorities for one additional year.
One-year technical extension of an existing authority is typically noncontroversial and often enacted quickly.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted procedural/housekeeping measure that precisely amends a single statutory date to extend existing authority.
Liberal emphasizes equity and climate-directed DPA uses.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenExtends strong executive procurement authorities with limited new legislative review.
- Potential burdenMay prolong regulatory obligations and compliance costs for affected businesses.
- Federal agenciesCould increase potential federal spending or contingent liabilities if used extensively.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberal emphasizes equity and climate-directed DPA uses.
Likely supportive of a short extension to preserve federal readiness and supply-chain tools, but cautious about oversight.
Support contingent on transparent, equity- and climate-oriented uses of the DPA.
Pragmatic and inclined to support a one-year extension to avoid gaps in authorities.
Wants clear reporting, limited scope, and a defined sunset to limit open-ended expansion and fiscal risk.
Generally supportive because the DPA supports national defense and industrial base resilience.
Wants restrained use to avoid market distortion and prefers oversight to prevent federal overreach into commerce.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
One-year technical extension of an existing authority is typically noncontroversial and often enacted quickly.
- No CBO or cost estimate included in text
- Exact operational effects of preserving authorities not detailed here
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberal emphasizes equity and climate-directed DPA uses.
One-year technical extension of an existing authority is typically noncontroversial and often enacted quickly.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-targeted procedural/housekeeping measure that precisely amends a single statutory date to extend existing authority.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.