Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill withdraws approximately 4,288 acres of Bureau of Land Management land near Placitas, New Mexico from location, entry, patent under the mining laws and from disposition under mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws, subject to valid existing rights. It allows the Secretary of the Interior to convey the surface estate under FLPMA or the Recreation and Public Purposes Act, but requires any surface conveyance to reserve the mineral estate to the United States.
Environmental protection versus unlocking resource development and jobs
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive policy change that clearly states its purpose and integrates with existing statutes, but it provides only minimal procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail.
This bill withdraws approximately 4,288 acres of Bureau of Land Management land near Placitas, New Mexico from location, entry, patent under the mining laws and from disposition under mineral leasing, mineral materials, and geothermal leasing laws, subject to valid existing rights.
It allows the Secretary of the Interior to convey the surface estate under FLPMA or the Recreation and Public Purposes Act, but requires any surface conveyance to reserve the mineral estate to the United States.
Content is narrow and low-cost making passage plausible, but local opposition, stakeholder pushback, and legislative calendar create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive policy change that clearly states its purpose and integrates with existing statutes, but it provides only minimal procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail.
Environmental protection versus unlocking resource development and jobs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Environmental protection versus unlocking resource development and jobs
Likely favorable.
The withdrawal prevents new mining and geothermal leasing on public lands, aligning with conservation goals.
The required reservation of the mineral estate keeps subsurface rights federal, preserving future public oversight.
Cautiously supportive if accompanied by stakeholder input and economic assessment.
The bill is a narrowly targeted withdrawal, but tradeoffs for local employment and revenue should be addressed.
Likely opposed.
The withdrawal restricts resource development and expands federal control over land decisions, limiting local economic options and potential energy or mineral production.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and low-cost making passage plausible, but local opposition, stakeholder pushback, and legislative calendar create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Environmental protection versus unlocking resource development and jobs
Content is narrow and low-cost making passage plausible, but local opposition, stakeholder pushback, and legislative calendar create uncert…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive policy change that clearly states its purpose and integrates with existing statutes, but it provides only minimal procedural, fiscal,…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.