Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
The bill amends the Livestock Indemnity Program to require the Secretary of Agriculture to determine livestock market value quarterly. The Secretary must coordinate with the Agricultural Marketing Service and may use other appropriate resources to set indemnity payment values.
Concern about administrative costs versus program responsiveness
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational amendment that prescribes quarterly market-value determinations for Livestock Indemnity Program payments and requires coordination with the Agricultural Marketing Service.
The bill amends the Livestock Indemnity Program to require the Secretary of Agriculture to determine livestock market value quarterly.
The Secretary must coordinate with the Agricultural Marketing Service and may use other appropriate resources to set indemnity payment values.
Small, technical amendment to benefit livestock producers; limited controversy and routine for agriculture packages, though budgetary impacts require review.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational amendment that prescribes quarterly market-value determinations for Livestock Indemnity Program payments and requires coordination with the Agricultural Marketing Service. It is concise and integrates cleanly into the cited statutory provision but omits methodological detail, funding/implementation particulars, and accountability measures.
Concern about administrative costs versus program responsiveness
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Concern about administrative costs versus program responsiveness
Generally supportive that payments better reflect real market losses for livestock owners, but cautious about implementation details.
Wants safeguards for small and family producers and transparency in how market values are calculated.
Pragmatic support for a data-driven update process that modernizes indemnity payments.
Wants clarity on methodology, administrative costs, and fiscal impact before full endorsement.
Likely favorable because it updates payments to reflect market conditions and supports agricultural producers.
Prefers limited additional bureaucracy and minimal fiscal burden.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technical amendment to benefit livestock producers; limited controversy and routine for agriculture packages, though budgetary impacts require review.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Concern about administrative costs versus program responsiveness
Small, technical amendment to benefit livestock producers; limited controversy and routine for agriculture packages, though budgetary impac…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused administrative/operational amendment that prescribes quarterly market-value determinations for Livestock Indemnity Program payments and requires…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.