Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Amends the John D. Dingell, Jr.
Liberals emphasize conservation gains; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation and boundary modification that is well-integrated into existing law and provides concrete mapping, acreage, and limited operational direction, but it omits fiscal acknowledgements and more comprehensive implementation oversight details.
Amends the John D.
Dingell, Jr.
Act to establish the Cerro de la Olla Wilderness (approximately 12,295 acres) within the Río Grande del Norte National Monument in Taos County, New Mexico, modifies the monument boundary per an April 1, 2025 map, allows maintenance of preexisting wildlife water development structures (subject to the Wilderness Act), and requires a cooperative agreement with New Mexico within one year specifying wildlife management terms.
Focused public-land protection with compromise elements raises prospects, though local opposition and Senate procedure add uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation and boundary modification that is well-integrated into existing law and provides concrete mapping, acreage, and limited operational direction, but it omits fiscal acknowledgements and more comprehensive implementation oversight details.
Liberals emphasize conservation gains; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize conservation gains; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.
Likely supportive because the bill expands legal wilderness protections and protects habitat on public lands.
May be cautious about exceptions for wildlife water structures and any potential grazing privileges.
Generally favorable as a modest, targeted conservation measure that respects local input.
Views it as pragmatic if implementation balances conservation, local uses, and administrative clarity.
Skeptical because it adds federal land-use restrictions and expands wilderness designation.
May accept some provisions if the cooperative agreement preserves local grazing and wildlife management.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Focused public-land protection with compromise elements raises prospects, though local opposition and Senate procedure add uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize conservation gains; conservatives emphasize federal overreach.
Focused public-land protection with compromise elements raises prospects, though local opposition and Senate procedure add uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation and boundary modification that is well-integrated into existing law and provides concrete mapping, acreage, and limited ope…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.