Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
The bill grants the State of Utah civil jurisdiction over civil causes of action involving the Shivwits Band of Paiutes that arise on or within Shivwits Indian lands.
It declares contracts and leases affecting those lands to fall within federal commerce/arising-under jurisdiction, giving federal courts jurisdiction over contract claims.
The bill states it does not abrogate the Tribe’s sovereign immunity and amends federal leasing statute to expressly include Shivwits trust land leasing authority.
Narrow, low-cost, tribe-specific change increases prospects, but potential tribal-sovereignty objections and intergovernmental consent remain material obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive policy change that clearly states its purpose and contains specific statutory text to effect the jurisdictional change, but it provides limited implementation, fiscal, and oversight detail.
Progressives emphasize tribal-sovereignty erosion; conservatives emphasize legal clarity.
Progressives emphasize tribal-sovereignty erosion; conservatives emphasize legal clarity.
Likely suspicious and critical: views the measure as a potential erosion of tribal self-governance and jurisdictional sovereignty.
May acknowledge clearer legal forums and leasing authority but emphasizes tribal consent and rights.
Cautiously favorable to the clarity the bill provides for civil and contract jurisdiction, but concerned about legal-constitutional ambiguities and tribal consultation.
Wants safeguards, funding, and clear interplay with sovereign immunity.
Generally supportive: values legal clarity, state-court access, and federal enforcement for contracts.
Sees benefits for businesses, residents, and accountability on tribal lands, while noting immunity language.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost, tribe-specific change increases prospects, but potential tribal-sovereignty objections and intergovernmental consent remain material obstacles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize tribal-sovereignty erosion; conservatives emphasize legal clarity.
Narrow, low-cost, tribe-specific change increases prospects, but potential tribal-sovereignty objections and intergovernmental consent rema…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive policy change that clearly states its purpose and contains specific statutory text to effect the jurisdictional change, but it provides limit…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.