S. 1525 (119th)Bill Overview

Common Cents Act

Finance and Financial Sector|Consumer affairsCurrency
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 30, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Treasury to stop minting and issuing one-cent coins within one year, except for pennies produced and sold to collectors at no net loss. It preserves pennies as legal tender.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize distributional harm to cash-dependent consumers

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is structurally direct and mechanically specific about the core actions (stop minting pennies; implement 5-cent rounding), integrates with identified existing statutes, and sets effective dates; however, it provides limited problem framing, minimal fiscal/resourcing analysis, little implementation guidance for affected parties, and almost no accountability or enforcement mechanisms.

The bill directs the Treasury to stop minting and issuing one-cent coins within one year, except for pennies produced and sold to collectors at no net loss.

It preserves pennies as legal tender.

It requires cash transactions and cash wage payments to be rounded to the nearest five cents using a symmetric rule, with electronic payments exempt.

Passage40/100

Modest, technocratic reform with some built-in compromises but facing organized stakeholder resistance and Senate procedure risks.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is structurally direct and mechanically specific about the core actions (stop minting pennies; implement 5-cent rounding), integrates with identified existing statutes, and sets effective dates; however, it provides limited problem framing, minimal fiscal/resourcing analysis, little implementation guidance for affected parties, and almost no accountability or enforcement mechanisms.

Contention45/100

Progressives emphasize distributional harm to cash-dependent consumers

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedConsumers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces Treasury production costs by eliminating routine penny minting, potentially saving government resources.
  • Potential benefitSimplifies cash handling by reducing coin types, lowering transaction time and coin-management burdens for retailers an…
  • Potential benefitDecreases metal usage and environmental footprint from coin production and transportation.
Likely burdened
  • ConsumersRounding could impose small net costs on cash-paying consumers, disproportionately affecting low-income individuals.
  • Potential burdenRetailers and banks will incur administrative costs updating pricing, registers, and training staff for rounding rules.
  • Potential burdenAggregate rounding may produce modest revenue gains for businesses, generating uneven distributional effects.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize distributional harm to cash-dependent consumers
Progressive65%

Generally supportive of ending penny production as a wasteful government expense, but wary about distributional consequences.

Concerned about how rounding will affect cash-dependent, low-income people and employees paid in cash.

Would seek consumer protections, monitoring, and enforcement against wage abuse.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Pragmatically supportive if the change saves public funds and rounding is neutral.

Views the symmetric rounding rule positively but wants clear implementation rules.

Emphasizes need for transparency on Mint savings and safeguards for cash-dependent populations.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally favorable because it reduces unnecessary federal spending and regulatory activity at the Mint.

Likes that collectors remain served and rounding is neutral.

Cautious about federal mandates affecting private cash transactions and potential downstream costs for businesses.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Modest, technocratic reform with some built-in compromises but facing organized stakeholder resistance and Senate procedure risks.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No official cost or savings estimate included
  • Merchant compliance and enforcement mechanisms unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize distributional harm to cash-dependent consumers

Modest, technocratic reform with some built-in compromises but facing organized stakeholder resistance and Senate procedure risks.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is structurally direct and mechanically specific about the core actions (stop minting pennies; implement 5-cent rounding), integrates with identified existing statute…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis