Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
This bill amends Section 501(b)(2) of division HH of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to expand replacement of stolen SNAP (EBT) benefits. It replaces subparagraph (A) to require replacement equal to the amount stolen, modifies subparagraph (B) punctuation, and removes subparagraph (C), thereby broadening benefit replacement eligibility or rules.
Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and full restoration.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to existing SNAP replacement rules: it directly revises statutory text to require replacement equal to the amount stolen and removes parts of the prior subsection.
This bill amends Section 501(b)(2) of division HH of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to expand replacement of stolen SNAP (EBT) benefits.
It replaces subparagraph (A) to require replacement equal to the amount stolen, modifies subparagraph (B) punctuation, and removes subparagraph (C), thereby broadening benefit replacement eligibility or rules.
Substantively modest and sympathetic change increases prospects, but many narrowly scoped bills do not clear committee or floor without being attached to larger legislation.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to existing SNAP replacement rules: it directly revises statutory text to require replacement equal to the amount stolen and removes parts of the prior subsection. The legal change is narrowly targeted and clearly tied to a specific statutory citation.
Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and full restoration.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and full restoration.
Likely supportive: seen as strengthening the safety net by ensuring households receive full reimbursement for stolen benefits.
Would view it as correcting an administrative barrier that left low-income families without food.
Generally favorable but cautious: supports reimbursing victims while seeking clarity on costs, verification, and program integrity.
Would want reporting, oversight, and limited fiscal impact before full endorsement.
Skeptical: supports protecting genuine victims but concerned about expanded federal liability, potential moral hazard, and increased program costs without offsets or tight verification.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantively modest and sympathetic change increases prospects, but many narrowly scoped bills do not clear committee or floor without being attached to larger legislation.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize anti-poverty and full restoration.
Substantively modest and sympathetic change increases prospects, but many narrowly scoped bills do not clear committee or floor without bei…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to existing SNAP replacement rules: it directly revises statutory text to require replacement equal to the amount stolen and remove…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.