Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Boulder Canyon Project Act to explicitly authorize the Secretary of the Interior to spend money from the Colorado River Dam fund, including amounts recovered on a non‑reimbursable basis, for authorized activities at the Boulder Canyon Project (Hoover Dam) and on land used for its construction and operation. Authorized uses include operations, maintenance, investigation and cleanup actions, and capital improvements, with spending done in consultation with Boulder Canyon Project contractors identified in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.
Left emphasizes cleanup, jobs, and resilience; right stresses fiscal limits and federal discretion.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise amendment granting the Secretary of the Interior explicit authority to spend specified Colorado River Dam fund monies for activities at Hoover Dam and related lands, and it names the funding source and consultation requirement.
This bill amends the Boulder Canyon Project Act to explicitly authorize the Secretary of the Interior to spend money from the Colorado River Dam fund, including amounts recovered on a non‑reimbursable basis, for authorized activities at the Boulder Canyon Project (Hoover Dam) and on land used for its construction and operation.
Authorized uses include operations, maintenance, investigation and cleanup actions, and capital improvements, with spending done in consultation with Boulder Canyon Project contractors identified in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.
Technical, low-controversy administrative authority over existing funds increases prospects; lacks new spending demands and includes stakeholder consultation.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise amendment granting the Secretary of the Interior explicit authority to spend specified Colorado River Dam fund monies for activities at Hoover Dam and related lands, and it names the funding source and consultation requirement. The bill is clear about the authority being granted but sparse on procedural, fiscal, and oversight details.
Left emphasizes cleanup, jobs, and resilience; right stresses fiscal limits and federal discretion.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes cleanup, jobs, and resilience; right stresses fiscal limits and federal discretion.
Likely supportive because it enables maintenance, environmental cleanup, and capital work on a major public infrastructure asset.
Would emphasize jobs, pollution remediation, climate resilience, and strong public oversight of spending.
Generally favorable if it improves maintenance and avoids new direct appropriations, but wants clear safeguards.
Would seek transparency, cost controls, and assurances on oversight before full endorsement.
Mixed to skeptical: supports maintaining critical infrastructure and using existing recovered funds, but worries about expanded federal discretion and weak fiscal controls.
Prefers limited federal role, clearer constraints, and stronger accountability.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technical, low-controversy administrative authority over existing funds increases prospects; lacks new spending demands and includes stakeholder consultation.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes cleanup, jobs, and resilience; right stresses fiscal limits and federal discretion.
Technical, low-controversy administrative authority over existing funds increases prospects; lacks new spending demands and includes stakeh…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise amendment granting the Secretary of the Interior explicit authority to spend specified Colorado River Dam fund monies for activities at Hoover Dam…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.