Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
The bill amends Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code to permit qualified distributions from 529 college savings plans to pay for certain aviation maintenance and commercial pilot course expenses. Eligible expenses include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and required equipment for Part 147 aviation maintenance schools and flight schools operating under Part 61 or Part 141.
Progressives worry about regressivity; conservatives emphasize private saving benefits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that properly targets a specific change to section 529(c) of the Internal Revenue Code by adding defined qualifying aviation-related expenses; it is precise about what courses qualify via CFR references and sets an effective date.
The bill amends Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code to permit qualified distributions from 529 college savings plans to pay for certain aviation maintenance and commercial pilot course expenses.
Eligible expenses include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and required equipment for Part 147 aviation maintenance schools and flight schools operating under Part 61 or Part 141.
The change applies to distributions made after enactment.
Modest, administrable expansion with limited fiscal impact improves prospects, but lacks built-in dealmaking and may be folded into larger tax packages.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that properly targets a specific change to section 529(c) of the Internal Revenue Code by adding defined qualifying aviation-related expenses; it is precise about what courses qualify via CFR references and sets an effective date.
Progressives worry about regressivity; conservatives emphasize private saving benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives worry about regressivity; conservatives emphasize private saving benefits.
Likely supportive of expanded vocational pathways and job training for under-served fields, but cautious about using a tax benefit to subsidize training without equity safeguards.
Concerned this primarily benefits families who already save in 529 plans and may not reach lower-income trainees.
Views the bill as a modest, practical step to ease costs for specific vocational training and relieve workforce shortages.
Favors it if accompanied by simple oversight, cost estimates, and limited fiscal risk.
Generally favorable as pro-jobs, pro-industry, and pro-choice (of education) policy that expands private savings use.
Prefers minimal new federal mandates or means-testing tied to the benefit.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, administrable expansion with limited fiscal impact improves prospects, but lacks built-in dealmaking and may be folded into larger tax packages.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives worry about regressivity; conservatives emphasize private saving benefits.
Modest, administrable expansion with limited fiscal impact improves prospects, but lacks built-in dealmaking and may be folded into larger…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that properly targets a specific change to section 529(c) of the Internal Revenue Code by adding defined qualifying aviation-related…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.