Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
This bill authorizes the National Science Foundation to make competitive, merit-reviewed awards to institutions and nonprofits to research and develop K–12 mathematical and statistical modeling education, including data science and computational thinking. It sets application and partnership requirements, allowable uses for professional development, curricula research, and community engagement, and requires evaluation and dissemination of results.
Liberals emphasize equity and increased funding for underrepresented students
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly motivated, statutory grant authority at NSF with accompanying definitions, eligible activities, partnership expectations, evaluation and reporting requirements, and a complementary NASEM study; it authorizes specific funding streams and includes a sunset.
This bill authorizes the National Science Foundation to make competitive, merit-reviewed awards to institutions and nonprofits to research and develop K–12 mathematical and statistical modeling education, including data science and computational thinking.
It sets application and partnership requirements, allowable uses for professional development, curricula research, and community engagement, and requires evaluation and dissemination of results.
The Director must seek a National Academies study on barriers and best practices, and the bill authorizes modest annual funding ($10M and $1M lines) for fiscal years 2026–2030, with a sunset on award authority.
Low controversy and small authorization help, but passage depends on committee action and future appropriations; many technical bills still stall.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly motivated, statutory grant authority at NSF with accompanying definitions, eligible activities, partnership expectations, evaluation and reporting requirements, and a complementary NASEM study; it authorizes specific funding streams and includes a sunset. The legislative construction is generally coherent and appropriate for an authorization bill but omits award-level specifics (award size and duration), detailed selection criteria, administrative safeguards, and standardized benchmark definitions.
Liberals emphasize equity and increased funding for underrepresented students
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize equity and increased funding for underrepresented students
Likely broadly supportive because the bill promotes equitable access to modern STEM education, teacher training, and research on inclusive practices.
It emphasizes underrepresented students, community connections, and evidence-based approaches.
Concerns would focus on whether the funding is sufficient and whether outcomes prioritize access and long-term supports.
Generally favorable as a targeted, evidence-driven federal role to modernize math education and strengthen STEM pipelines.
Appreciates the emphasis on evaluation, partnerships, and stakeholder communication, but is cautious about program duplication, administrative burden, and whether funding matches objectives.
Will want clear metrics and cost-effectiveness.
Mixed to skeptical: supports workforce and STEM development goals but worried about federal intrusion into curriculum and local control.
Concerns about new federal grant programs, potential ideological or pedagogical mandates, and enduring costs outweigh modest benefits.
May prefer state-led or private-sector approaches.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low controversy and small authorization help, but passage depends on committee action and future appropriations; many technical bills still stall.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize equity and increased funding for underrepresented students
Low controversy and small authorization help, but passage depends on committee action and future appropriations; many technical bills still…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly motivated, statutory grant authority at NSF with accompanying definitions, eligible activities, partnership expectations, evaluation and reporti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.