Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 141.
The bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to revise FMVSS-related regulations to add specific frontal and side crash test dummies: THOR 50th percentile adult male and THOR 5th percentile adult female for frontal tests, and 50th and 5th percentile Worldwide Harmonized Side Impact Dummies for side tests. It sets short, specific deadlines for proposed and final rules, requires updating injury criteria and New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) testing procedures, and mandates reports to Congress about timelines and foreign testing devices.
Emphasis on female/5th percentile dummies versus concerns over regulatory cost
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative directive that sets concrete rulemaking requirements, naming specific testing devices, CFR parts to be updated, detailed deadlines, and reporting obligations.
The bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to revise FMVSS-related regulations to add specific frontal and side crash test dummies: THOR 50th percentile adult male and THOR 5th percentile adult female for frontal tests, and 50th and 5th percentile Worldwide Harmonized Side Impact Dummies for side tests.
It sets short, specific deadlines for proposed and final rules, requires updating injury criteria and New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) testing procedures, and mandates reports to Congress about timelines and foreign testing devices.
A savings clause preserves the Secretary’s ability to update testing devices through separate or later proceedings.
Targeted, safety-oriented changes generally have reasonable prospects, but tight rulemaking deadlines and industry/regulatory feasibility create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative directive that sets concrete rulemaking requirements, naming specific testing devices, CFR parts to be updated, detailed deadlines, and reporting obligations. It establishes clear implementation sequencing and integrates into existing regulatory parts.
Emphasis on female/5th percentile dummies versus concerns over regulatory cost
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Emphasis on female/5th percentile dummies versus concerns over regulatory cost
Likely strongly supportive because the bill requires testing that better represents female and diverse adult bodies, addressing documented safety disparities.
It modernizes injury criteria using real‑world data and forces NCAP to include these dummies, improving consumer information and equity in safety performance.
Generally supportive of modernizing safety testing and basing criteria on real-world injuries, but cautious about feasibility and costs.
Will favor careful implementation, coordination with industry, and timelines that avoid legal or technical problems while preserving consumer benefits.
Skeptical: supports vehicle safety in principle but concerned about regulatory overreach, tight deadlines, and cost burdens on manufacturers.
Prefers voluntary NCAP adjustments, international harmonization, or slower rulemaking to avoid technical errors and economic impacts.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, safety-oriented changes generally have reasonable prospects, but tight rulemaking deadlines and industry/regulatory feasibility create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Emphasis on female/5th percentile dummies versus concerns over regulatory cost
Targeted, safety-oriented changes generally have reasonable prospects, but tight rulemaking deadlines and industry/regulatory feasibility c…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative directive that sets concrete rulemaking requirements, naming specific testing devices, CFR parts to be updated, detailed deadlines,…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.