Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill adds developing, implementing, or expanding research-based public service announcement (PSA) campaigns targeted at youth substance use prevention to the list of allowable grant activities under Section 3021(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Eligible campaigns may use television, radio, print, outdoor, digital media, and youth PSA contests.
Federal role: expansion of federal grant authority vs state/local control
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends an existing federal grant statute to authorize research-based youth substance-use PSA campaigns and imposes an annual reporting requirement on the Attorney General.
This bill adds developing, implementing, or expanding research-based public service announcement (PSA) campaigns targeted at youth substance use prevention to the list of allowable grant activities under Section 3021(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
Eligible campaigns may use television, radio, print, outdoor, digital media, and youth PSA contests.
The Attorney General must publish an annual report on such grants describing each campaign, the research behind it, regional messaging, links to other grantee prevention efforts, and an evaluation of campaign success, including effects on youth drug use.
Low controversy, limited cost implications, and clear reporting likely make it attractive for passage or inclusion in broader legislation; funding remains uncertain.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends an existing federal grant statute to authorize research-based youth substance-use PSA campaigns and imposes an annual reporting requirement on the Attorney General. It sets out the principal legal change and required report elements but leaves out several implementation and fiscal details that would be expected for a substantive expansion of grant authority.
Federal role: expansion of federal grant authority vs state/local control
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Federal role: expansion of federal grant authority vs state/local control
Likely broadly supportive because the bill promotes evidence-based youth prevention, youth engagement, and requires evaluation and transparency.
They will welcome the research and reporting requirements but may press for harm-reduction language, equity in outreach, and protections against stigmatizing or punitive messaging.
They may also note that funding amounts and implementation details are unspecified.
Generally favorable but cautious.
The bill is narrowly targeted, emphasizes evidence and evaluation, and contains transparency measures, which align with pragmatic priorities.
Concerns will focus on measurable outcomes, budgetary impact, duplication with existing programs, and clear evaluation metrics.
Skeptical of expanding federal grant-authority for messaging campaigns; may support youth prevention in principle but prefers state and local control, parental involvement, and limits on federal spending.
Concerned about federal overreach, potential ideological content, and lack of specified funding or fiscal restraint.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low controversy, limited cost implications, and clear reporting likely make it attractive for passage or inclusion in broader legislation; funding remains uncertain.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Federal role: expansion of federal grant authority vs state/local control
Low controversy, limited cost implications, and clear reporting likely make it attractive for passage or inclusion in broader legislation;…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends an existing federal grant statute to authorize research-based youth substance-use PSA campaigns and imposes an annual reporting requiremen…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.