S. 1616 (119th)Bill Overview

PRECISE Act of 2025

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill (PRECISE Act of 2025) adds definitions for “precision agriculture” and “precision agriculture technology,” and authorizes and incentivizes wider adoption of precision agriculture practices and equipment. It amends the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act and the Food Security Act to allow financing, loans, and loan guarantees for precision agriculture costs; permits increased payments (up to 90% of costs) under EQIP for precision technologies; expands eligibility for Conservation Stewardship Program supplemental payments; and emphasizes third‑party technical assistance for soil health and precision planning.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize environmental gains and want equity/data safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused set of statutory amendments that integrates precision agriculture into existing farm and conservation program authorities, provides definitional clarity, and authorizes specific payment and loan mechanisms while leaving detailed administration to the Secretary.

The bill (PRECISE Act of 2025) adds definitions for “precision agriculture” and “precision agriculture technology,” and authorizes and incentivizes wider adoption of precision agriculture practices and equipment.

It amends the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act and the Food Security Act to allow financing, loans, and loan guarantees for precision agriculture costs; permits increased payments (up to 90% of costs) under EQIP for precision technologies; expands eligibility for Conservation Stewardship Program supplemental payments; and emphasizes third‑party technical assistance for soil health and precision planning.

Passage60/100

Relatively narrow, uncontroversial incentives for agriculture and conservation raise program costs but fit existing program structure, making enactment plausible especially if attached to broader farm legislation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused set of statutory amendments that integrates precision agriculture into existing farm and conservation program authorities, provides definitional clarity, and authorizes specific payment and loan mechanisms while leaving detailed administration to the Secretary.

Contention50/100

Liberals emphasize environmental gains and want equity/data safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitLowers financial barriers by allowing loans and loan guarantees to cover precision agriculture acquisition and conserva…
  • Potential benefitAuthorizes payments up to 90 percent of precision adoption costs, substantially increasing affordability for participat…
  • Potential benefitEncourages more efficient input use, potentially reducing fertilizer, pesticide, and water consumption and related runo…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal subsidy costs and potential budgetary outlays for expanded payments and loan guarantees.
  • Potential burdenMay favor larger or wealthier farms able to capitalize on precision technology, raising equity and consolidation concer…
  • Potential burdenExpands use of sensors and data platforms, creating data privacy, ownership, and cybersecurity concerns for producers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize environmental gains and want equity/data safeguards
Progressive70%

Likely supportive overall because the bill promotes conservation and reduced input waste, but concerned by omissions.

Major positives are environmental efficiency and technical assistance, while risks include equity, data privacy, and corporate control of farm data.

Support would be stronger with explicit protections for small and disadvantaged producers and data-governance safeguards.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable as a voluntary, incentive‑based measure that modernizes conservation policy.

Appreciates flexibility for states and use of loans and technical assistance, but wants clarity on cost, oversight, and measurable conservation outcomes.

Support is conditional on cost controls and program evaluation.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Mixed to skeptical: supports voluntary, productivity‑enhancing tools but worries about expanding federal programs and higher subsidy levels.

Concerned about increased federal spending, new definitions expanding program reach, and use of third‑party providers.

Might support if fiscal impacts are limited and participation remains voluntary.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Relatively narrow, uncontroversial incentives for agriculture and conservation raise program costs but fit existing program structure, making enactment plausible especially if attached to broader farm legislation.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office cost estimate included
  • Total additional appropriations or offsets required
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize environmental gains and want equity/data safeguards

Relatively narrow, uncontroversial incentives for agriculture and conservation raise program costs but fit existing program structure, maki…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused set of statutory amendments that integrates precision agriculture into existing farm and conservation program authorities, provides definitional clarity,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis