S. 1708 (119th)Bill Overview

Regulatory Accountability Act

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 12, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill (Regulatory Accountability Act) amends the Administrative Procedure Act and related statutes to impose new procedural requirements on federal rulemaking. It defines "guidance," "major guidance," and "major rule," raises analytic and public‑notice obligations (cost‑benefit, alternatives, data transparency, longer comment periods, advanced notices), centralizes review and oversight with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA/Administrator), and adds retrospective assessment and publication requirements for major rules.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize risk of delayed or weakened health and environmental rules

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed, procedurally focused revision of administrative rulemaking law that specifies definitions, review steps, analytic requirements, and OIRA oversight while also adding reporting and retrospective-assessment obligations.

This bill (Regulatory Accountability Act) amends the Administrative Procedure Act and related statutes to impose new procedural requirements on federal rulemaking.

It defines "guidance," "major guidance," and "major rule," raises analytic and public‑notice obligations (cost‑benefit, alternatives, data transparency, longer comment periods, advanced notices), centralizes review and oversight with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA/Administrator), and adds retrospective assessment and publication requirements for major rules.

It also restricts certain agency public advocacy after a proposed rule, tightens publication and timing rules for final, interim, and direct final rules, and changes standards and limits for judicial review.

Passage30/100

Substantial, ideologically loaded procedural reforms with high complexity and broad statutory reach lower enactment odds absent strong bipartisan buy‑in or alignment with majority priorities.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed, procedurally focused revision of administrative rulemaking law that specifies definitions, review steps, analytic requirements, and OIRA oversight while also adding reporting and retrospective-assessment obligations.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize risk of delayed or weakened health and environmental rules

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases transparency by requiring publication of studies, models, and supporting data in rule dockets.
  • Potential benefitPromotes more rigorous cost‑benefit and risk analysis for major regulatory actions.
  • Potential benefitCreates greater procedural predictability through timetables, frameworks, and standardized alternatives analysis.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIntroduces additional procedural steps likely to lengthen rulemaking timelines and delay implementation.
  • Potential burdenIncreases analytic and administrative workload, raising costs for agencies and stakeholders doing compliance analysis.
  • Potential burdenNet‑benefit maximization requirement could make adoption of costly public‑health or environmental protections harder.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize risk of delayed or weakened health and environmental rules
Progressive20%

Likely critical.

The persona would see the bill as creating procedural barriers that could delay or weaken public‑health, environmental, labor, and civil‑rights protections.

They would be concerned about concentrated review authority at OIRA and limits on agency guidance and outreach.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Cautiously receptive but concerned.

The persona would appreciate clearer analytic standards, transparency, and predictability, while worrying about added delays, resource needs for thorough analyses, and potential for politicized central review.

They'd weigh process improvements against real‑world implementation costs.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Favorable.

The persona would view the bill as a useful check on regulatory overreach, improving economic analysis, reducing unexpected burdens, and increasing executive branch oversight through OIRA.

They would welcome limits on guidance and stronger cost‑benefit rules.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Substantial, ideologically loaded procedural reforms with high complexity and broad statutory reach lower enactment odds absent strong bipartisan buy‑in or alignment with majority priorities.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Whether bill can attract bipartisan support in committee
  • Scale of stakeholder mobilization (industry, labor, environmental groups)
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize risk of delayed or weakened health and environmental rules

Substantial, ideologically loaded procedural reforms with high complexity and broad statutory reach lower enactment odds absent strong bipa…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed, procedurally focused revision of administrative rulemaking law that specifies definitions, review steps, analytic requirements, and OIRA oversight whil…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis