Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Requires each federal agency that issues permits to publish a webpage showing permit-application status. The page must list stages completed, duration of each stage, current status and duration, contact information for reviewers, required remaining stages, and an estimated timeline for a decision.
Whether listing individual reviewer contacts risks harassment versus aids accountability
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative requirement (agency webpages displaying permit-application status and specified data elements) and uses statutory definitions to delimit covered entities, but it lacks implementation detail that would normally accompany a cross-agency operational mandate, including timelines, funding, data standards, privacy/exemption provisions, and accountability mechanisms.
Requires each federal agency that issues permits to publish a webpage showing permit-application status.
The page must list stages completed, duration of each stage, current status and duration, contact information for reviewers, required remaining stages, and an estimated timeline for a decision.
Narrow, administratively focused bill with bipartisan appeal but real implementation costs, privacy/security issues, and no funding or exemptions decrease enactment odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative requirement (agency webpages displaying permit-application status and specified data elements) and uses statutory definitions to delimit covered entities, but it lacks implementation detail that would normally accompany a cross-agency operational mandate, including timelines, funding, data standards, privacy/exemption provisions, and accountability mechanisms.
Whether listing individual reviewer contacts risks harassment versus aids accountability
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Whether listing individual reviewer contacts risks harassment versus aids accountability
Generally supportive because the bill increases transparency and public accountability in permitting.
Likely to welcome predictable timelines that can help communities monitor environmental and civil-rights-related permits.
Would be concerned about staff safety and privacy, and want safeguards for confidentiality and public-interest oversight.
Supportive if implemented practically and funded.
Sees transparency as improving efficiency and accountability but wants careful rules to avoid operational disruption.
Will look for exemptions, standards, and modest funding to make the webpages reliable and secure.
Likely favorable toward transparency and accountability of permitting decisions.
Will welcome potential to expose bureaucratic delays and pressure agencies to act faster.
May oppose aspects seen as federal micromanagement of processes or threats to staff safety, and will push for limited burdens and clear constraints on personal data disclosure.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administratively focused bill with bipartisan appeal but real implementation costs, privacy/security issues, and no funding or exemptions decrease enactment odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Whether listing individual reviewer contacts risks harassment versus aids accountability
Narrow, administratively focused bill with bipartisan appeal but real implementation costs, privacy/security issues, and no funding or exem…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative requirement (agency webpages displaying permit-application status and specified data elements) and uses statutory definitions to de…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.