Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
This bill repeals and amends numerous diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)–related provisions added to the CHIPS and Science Act and the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, removing certain DEI programs, reporting, and positions (including an NSF Chief Diversity Officer). It also prohibits federal agencies from imposing nonstatutory mandates on entities seeking federal funds covering DEI hiring plans, childcare and wraparound services, community investment, environmental and climate planning, project labor agreements, and consultation with labor organizations.
Progressives emphasize lost DEI programs and data collection harms to equity.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is precise in identifying and amending targeted statutory provisions and in defining the new prohibition on nonstatutory mandates.
This bill repeals and amends numerous diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)–related provisions added to the CHIPS and Science Act and the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act, removing certain DEI programs, reporting, and positions (including an NSF Chief Diversity Officer).
It also prohibits federal agencies from imposing nonstatutory mandates on entities seeking federal funds covering DEI hiring plans, childcare and wraparound services, community investment, environmental and climate planning, project labor agreements, and consultation with labor organizations.
The bill preserves some STEM supports for HBCUs and TCUs but removes race‑based activities in several programs and makes various technical conforming changes.
Highly partisan subject matter, cross-cutting statutory changes, and restraints on agency discretion make enactment uncertain absent strong, narrow coalitions.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is precise in identifying and amending targeted statutory provisions and in defining the new prohibition on nonstatutory mandates. It excels at textual specificity and integration with existing law but provides limited implementation planning, fiscal acknowledgement, mitigation of transitional effects, or accountability mechanisms.
Progressives emphasize lost DEI programs and data collection harms to equity.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize lost DEI programs and data collection harms to equity.
This persona would likely oppose the bill as a rollback of targeted efforts to diversify STEM and support underrepresented communities.
They would view repeals of DEI funding, data collection, and positions as weakening barriers removal, reducing equity-focused research, and potentially harming pipeline programs.
A centrist would see some merit in limiting nonstatutory agency mandates and streamlining implementation, but worry about unintended consequences for workforce diversity and pipeline programs.
They would weigh efficiency gains against losses in targeted outreach and supports.
This persona would likely support the bill as restoring program focus to core scientific goals and preventing agencies from imposing ideological or extra-statutory DEI requirements.
They would view prohibitions on nonstatutory mandates as protecting recipients from mission‑drifting conditions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Highly partisan subject matter, cross-cutting statutory changes, and restraints on agency discretion make enactment uncertain absent strong, narrow coalitions.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize lost DEI programs and data collection harms to equity.
Highly partisan subject matter, cross-cutting statutory changes, and restraints on agency discretion make enactment uncertain absent strong…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is precise in identifying and amending targeted statutory provisions and in defining the new prohibition on nonstatutory mandates. It excels at textual specificity an…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.