Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
The bill prohibits federally funded U.S. research institutions, federal research agencies, and U.S. companies that receive federal financial assistance from engaging in scientific research or technical exchanges with designated Chinese entities of concern when the work could directly or potentially contribute to China’s military‑civil fusion priorities. The Secretary of Defense, with interagency consultation, will maintain a publicly updated website listing covered technology fields and, to the extent practicable, Chinese entities of concern; covered entities must file annual reports about relationships with those entities.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and discrimination risks
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and sets substantive new prohibitions and reporting obligations with defined responsible parties.
The bill prohibits federally funded U.S. research institutions, federal research agencies, and U.S. companies that receive federal financial assistance from engaging in scientific research or technical exchanges with designated Chinese entities of concern when the work could directly or potentially contribute to China’s military‑civil fusion priorities.
The Secretary of Defense, with interagency consultation, will maintain a publicly updated website listing covered technology fields and, to the extent practicable, Chinese entities of concern; covered entities must file annual reports about relationships with those entities.
Violations (and certain reporting failures) result in ineligibility for federal financial assistance, and the Secretary of Defense is authorized to promulgate enforcement regulations and audit filings.
Substantial national security rationale, but broad federal intrusion into research, stakeholder pushback, and enforcement challenges lower standalone prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and sets substantive new prohibitions and reporting obligations with defined responsible parties. It provides a workable high-level framework (definitions, a mandated website and list, reporting cycles, and an enforcement consequence) and assigns DoD a central coordinating and regulatory role.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and discrimination risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and discrimination risks
Likely cautious support for protecting sensitive technologies but concerned about sweeping restrictions on academic collaboration and civil liberties.
Worries will center on academic freedom, potential discrimination against researchers with Chinese ties, and harms to open scientific exchange.
Generally supportive if the bill is narrowly and clearly implemented; sees it as a reasonable national security tool but expects careful calibration to avoid unnecessary damage to research competitiveness.
Wants clear definitions, predictable enforcement, and minimized administrative disruption.
Strongly supportive as a necessary, targeted measure to block PRC military access to U.S. technology.
Views funding‑condition enforcement as an appropriate lever and approves broad definitions to prevent circumvention.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantial national security rationale, but broad federal intrusion into research, stakeholder pushback, and enforcement challenges lower standalone prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize academic freedom and discrimination risks
Substantial national security rationale, but broad federal intrusion into research, stakeholder pushback, and enforcement challenges lower…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and sets substantive new prohibitions and reporting obligations with defined responsible parties. It provides a workable high-level framew…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.