Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
The bill requires States to submit standardized abortion data to a new CDC surveillance system and makes receipt of certain Medicaid family-planning payments contingent on timely submission. It defines mandatory variables (age, gestational age, race, ethnicity, method, marital status, pregnancy history, residence, survival of the child) and allows cross-tabulation.
Privacy and access: left worries about patient privacy; right prioritizes transparency.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines a policy change requiring standardized abortion data reporting and ties state Medicaid family-planning payments to compliance, while also creating a statutory reporting role for CDC.
The bill requires States to submit standardized abortion data to a new CDC surveillance system and makes receipt of certain Medicaid family-planning payments contingent on timely submission.
It defines mandatory variables (age, gestational age, race, ethnicity, method, marital status, pregnancy history, residence, survival of the child) and allows cross-tabulation.
States must certify accuracy, face a one-year funding disqualification for knowingly submitting false data, and receive CDC technical assistance.
High controversy around abortion and federalism implications lower prospects despite narrow administrative framing and built-in flexibilities.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines a policy change requiring standardized abortion data reporting and ties state Medicaid family-planning payments to compliance, while also creating a statutory reporting role for CDC. It sets out many necessary components (variables, cross-tabulation, certification, deadlines, technical assistance, and an annual CDC report), but contains drafting ambiguities, incomplete cross-references, and lacks funding and comprehensive operational safeguards.
Privacy and access: left worries about patient privacy; right prioritizes transparency.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Privacy and access: left worries about patient privacy; right prioritizes transparency.
Likely skeptical overall.
While better data can inform policy, conditioning Medicaid family-planning funds on reporting risks reducing access and threatens patient privacy.
The inclusion of detailed cross-tabulation and a variable on whether the child survived the abortion raises concern about stigmatizing language and potential data misuse.
Mixed and pragmatic.
Supports better, standardized data for public-health planning but worries about implementation details, privacy, and unintended effects on access.
Would seek clarifications on timing, enforcement triggers, and cost-sharing for state compliance.
Generally favorable.
Sees the bill as improving accountability and transparency about abortion practices.
Supports conditioning Medicaid family-planning funding on compliance and the inclusion of variables like survival of the child as important oversight measures.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
High controversy around abortion and federalism implications lower prospects despite narrow administrative framing and built-in flexibilities.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy and access: left worries about patient privacy; right prioritizes transparency.
High controversy around abortion and federalism implications lower prospects despite narrow administrative framing and built-in flexibiliti…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines a policy change requiring standardized abortion data reporting and ties state Medicaid family-planning payments to compliance, while also creating a s…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.