S. 1838 (119th)Bill Overview

DeOndra Dixon INCLUDE Project Act of 2025

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
May 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill adds a new section to the Public Health Service Act authorizing the NIH Director to establish the INCLUDE Project, a program of research, training, and investigation related to Down syndrome. It directs NIH to fund basic science, assemble large study populations, expand inclusive clinical trials, study biological mechanisms and biomarkers, investigate co-occurring conditions, improve quality of life, coordinate NIH activities to avoid duplication, provide technical assistance, and submit biennial reports to Congress cataloging supported research and real-world evidence.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize disability-led engagement and social supports.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory mandate for the NIH to carry out a coordinated Down syndrome research program (the INCLUDE Project), defining areas of focus and requiring interagency coordination and biennial congressional reporting.

This bill adds a new section to the Public Health Service Act authorizing the NIH Director to establish the INCLUDE Project, a program of research, training, and investigation related to Down syndrome.

It directs NIH to fund basic science, assemble large study populations, expand inclusive clinical trials, study biological mechanisms and biomarkers, investigate co-occurring conditions, improve quality of life, coordinate NIH activities to avoid duplication, provide technical assistance, and submit biennial reports to Congress cataloging supported research and real-world evidence.

Passage65/100

Content is narrowly focused, nonideological, and oversight-oriented; passage hinges mainly on appropriations inclusion and committee prioritization.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory mandate for the NIH to carry out a coordinated Down syndrome research program (the INCLUDE Project), defining areas of focus and requiring interagency coordination and biennial congressional reporting. It places responsibility at the NIH Director level and integrates the new program into the Public Health Service Act.

Contention45/100

Progressives emphasize disability-led engagement and social supports.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands research into Down syndrome and co-occurring conditions, potentially improving targeted treatments.
  • Potential benefitIncreased clinical trials inclusive of Down syndrome participants could generate therapies and real-world evidence.
  • Potential benefitEstablishing a large cohort and data infrastructure may accelerate discovery and biomarker validation.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRequires additional federal spending and likely new appropriations to implement the program.
  • Potential burdenAssembling large study populations raises participant privacy and data-security concerns.
  • Potential burdenIncreased coordination and reporting may add administrative burden for NIH and grantees.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize disability-led engagement and social supports.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill funds inclusive research and aims to improve quality of life for people with Down syndrome.

Would press for disability-community leadership, equitable access to resulting therapies, and safeguards against research that could be used for discriminatory prenatal practices.

Wants funding for social supports as well as biomedical research; some ethical concerns are speculative given bill text.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable as targeted biomedical research and coordinated NIH activity are pragmatic goals.

Wants clarity on funding, measurable goals, and oversight to prevent duplication and uncontrolled spending.

Views biennial reporting positively for accountability.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Cautiously receptive to research improving health outcomes for a clearly defined population, but concerned about new federal programs and spending.

Will emphasize limiting federal expansion, preventing regulatory burdens, and favoring private-sector or state roles where appropriate.

Skepticism about open-ended NIH authority and unspecified funding.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Content is narrowly focused, nonideological, and oversight-oriented; passage hinges mainly on appropriations inclusion and committee prioritization.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No authorization of appropriations or cost estimate in text
  • Potential overlap with existing NIH programs and portfolios
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize disability-led engagement and social supports.

Content is narrowly focused, nonideological, and oversight-oriented; passage hinges mainly on appropriations inclusion and committee priori…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory mandate for the NIH to carry out a coordinated Down syndrome research program (the INCLUDE Project), defining areas of focus and requiring…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis