S. 1874 (119th)Bill Overview

Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2025

Health|Employment and training programsHealth
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
May 22, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill reauthorizes and amends Title VIII nursing workforce programs in the Public Health Service Act. It updates eligible advanced nursing education programs and allowable grant uses, adds capacity-building activities, and expands clinical education partnerships.

Why people may split

Size and acceptability of increased federal appropriations

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment that clearly identifies the target programs, makes concrete changes to allowable uses and eligible program types, and sets specific authorization levels for subsequent fiscal years; however, it provides limited operational detail on implementation procedures, accountability mechanisms, and protections against misuse.

The bill reauthorizes and amends Title VIII nursing workforce programs in the Public Health Service Act.

It updates eligible advanced nursing education programs and allowable grant uses, adds capacity-building activities, and expands clinical education partnerships.

It adds survivors of sexual assault to certain eligible populations and clarifies allowable fee uses such as clinical education and preceptors.

Passage60/100

Modest, technical updates to popular workforce programs and modest funding increases improve odds; actual enactment depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment that clearly identifies the target programs, makes concrete changes to allowable uses and eligible program types, and sets specific authorization levels for subsequent fiscal years; however, it provides limited operational detail on implementation procedures, accountability mechanisms, and protections against misuse.

Contention52/100

Size and acceptability of increased federal appropriations

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · StudentsFederal agencies · Schools

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreased federal funding could expand nursing education capacity and raise enrollment at nursing programs.
  • Potential benefitExpanded allowable investments in simulation, AR, and telehealth could modernize training and clinical preparedness.
  • StudentsGrant coverage of clinical education and preceptor fees may reduce placement cost barriers for students.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesHigher authorized appropriations increase federal spending obligations and could strain budget allocations.
  • SchoolsNew program rules and grant administration may raise compliance and reporting costs for nursing schools.
  • Potential burdenProgram priorities could concentrate funding on certain specialties, reducing resources for other workforce needs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Size and acceptability of increased federal appropriations
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive.

The bill increases federal investment in nursing education, modernizes training tools, and expands clinical training partnerships and inclusions for survivors.

Supporters would view it as addressing shortages and equity in the health workforce.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious.

The bill targets workforce shortages and updates technology uses, while modestly increasing authorization.

A centrist would seek clear performance metrics and fiscal transparency before full endorsement.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Skeptical but not uniformly opposed.

While improving nurse supply is a practical goal, the bill expands federal program scope and raises authorizations, prompting concerns about federal overreach and spending efficiency.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Modest, technical updates to popular workforce programs and modest funding increases improve odds; actual enactment depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Whether authorizations will be funded in appropriations bills
  • Absent official cost estimate or fiscal note in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Size and acceptability of increased federal appropriations

Modest, technical updates to popular workforce programs and modest funding increases improve odds; actual enactment depends on appropriatio…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment that clearly identifies the target programs, makes concrete changes to allowable uses and eligible program types,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis