Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Requires the HHS Secretary to create and operate an ADA-compliant interactive online dashboard within two years. The dashboard will centralize federal grant information related to mental health and substance use disorders, include search and linking functions, and allow voluntary state or Tribal submission of subgrant distribution data.
Liberals emphasize access and equity benefits; conservatives stress cost and federal expansion.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the goal and assigns responsibility to HHS with concrete deadlines and minimum functional requirements, but it leaves out key operational details and resource authorization that would typically be required to implement and sustain a cross-jurisdictional federal dashboard.
Requires the HHS Secretary to create and operate an ADA-compliant interactive online dashboard within two years.
The dashboard will centralize federal grant information related to mental health and substance use disorders, include search and linking functions, and allow voluntary state or Tribal submission of subgrant distribution data.
The Secretary must consult many federal agencies, Tribal governments, educational institutions, providers, and other stakeholders, and publish an implementation plan within 180 days.
Content is narrow, technical, and non-controversial; main barriers are funding allocation and legislative calendar rather than policy opposition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the goal and assigns responsibility to HHS with concrete deadlines and minimum functional requirements, but it leaves out key operational details and resource authorization that would typically be required to implement and sustain a cross-jurisdictional federal dashboard.
Liberals emphasize access and equity benefits; conservatives stress cost and federal expansion.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize access and equity benefits; conservatives stress cost and federal expansion.
Likely broadly supportive.
Sees the bill as improving equitable access to grant opportunities for underserved communities and Tribal entities.
Values ADA compliance, stakeholder consultation, and transparency that helps nonprofits, schools, and providers compete for funds.
Generally favorable but pragmatic and cautious.
Sees value in consolidating information to reduce applicant confusion and improve efficiency.
Concerned about implementation costs, possible duplication with existing portals, and ensuring the dashboard stays current.
Cautiously skeptical.
Supports transparency in principle but worries about federal expansion, ongoing costs, and bureaucratic complexity.
Prefers using or improving existing systems rather than creating new federal infrastructure.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow, technical, and non-controversial; main barriers are funding allocation and legislative calendar rather than policy opposition.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize access and equity benefits; conservatives stress cost and federal expansion.
Content is narrow, technical, and non-controversial; main barriers are funding allocation and legislative calendar rather than policy oppos…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the goal and assigns responsibility to HHS with concrete deadlines and minimum functional requirements, but it leaves out key operational details and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.