Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill amends the Victims of Crime Act to specify additional sources that must be deposited into the Crime Victims Fund. It expressly adds proceeds from declinations of criminal prosecution or similar final dispositions without conviction.
Liberal emphasizes expanded victim services funding and stability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that is precise about what legal changes are to be made and how those changes integrate with existing code.
This bill amends the Victims of Crime Act to specify additional sources that must be deposited into the Crime Victims Fund.
It expressly adds proceeds from declinations of criminal prosecution or similar final dispositions without conviction.
It also, on a temporary basis through September 30, 2030, directs certain amounts from False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729–3731) recoveries into the Fund, excluding qui tam relator awards and amounts reimbursing the United States for government damages.
Narrow, administratively focused change with compromise features increases viability, but fiscal reallocation and stakeholder resistance create meaningful barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that is precise about what legal changes are to be made and how those changes integrate with existing code. It provides clear textual mechanics and limited edge-case handling (exceptions and a sunset) but omits fiscal disclosure and any measurement or oversight provisions.
Liberal emphasizes expanded victim services funding and stability.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes expanded victim services funding and stability.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill increases and stabilizes funding for victim services.
It channels new revenue to the Crime Victims Fund while preserving relator shares and government reimbursements.
Cautiously favorable if the change stabilizes victim services without undermining federal enforcement incentives.
Wants clear budget scoring and oversight of DOJ settlements to confirm impacts.
Skeptical because it diverts certain False Claims Act proceeds away from general federal receipts and may interfere with enforcement and settlement flexibility.
Support only if victim funding need outweighs enforcement tradeoffs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administratively focused change with compromise features increases viability, but fiscal reallocation and stakeholder resistance create meaningful barriers.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes expanded victim services funding and stability.
Narrow, administratively focused change with compromise features increases viability, but fiscal reallocation and stakeholder resistance cr…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that is precise about what legal changes are to be made and how those changes integrate with existing code. It provides clear textua…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.