Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
This bill amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act to create a 15-member Panel of Health Advisors within the Congressional Budget Office.
The Panel will provide technical expertise on CBO health studies, cost estimates, models, and publications; meet at least annually; issue an annual report with recommendations; and have members appointed by budget committee chairs/ranking members and the CBO Director.
The Director must publish the annual report, may set disclosure/confidentiality rules, and members serve staggered three-year terms as special government employees, limited to two terms.
Narrow, administrative, and bipartisan mechanics improve prospects, but many technical bills nonetheless stall in committee or face concern over conflicts and resource needs.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear statutory framework for a CBO-based advisory panel on health, with specific membership rules, defined duties, and an annual reporting and publication requirement. It codifies many expected elements of an advisory body while leaving several operational and resourcing matters unspecified.
Progressives stress transparency and conflict-of-interest safeguards.
Progressives stress transparency and conflict-of-interest safeguards.
Generally supportive of improving CBO technical capacity on health policy, but cautious about appointments and conflicts of interest.
Will welcome clearer, more rigorous cost estimates for health legislation while demanding strong transparency and public-interest representation.
Favorable overall: codifying expert advice to CBO is pragmatic and likely to improve legislative scoring.
Wants clear conflict-of-interest safeguards, predictable processes, and minimal politicization before full endorsement.
Cautious-to-moderately supportive if the Panel improves CBO accuracy without expanding federal bureaucracy.
Prefers members with private-sector experience and protections for proprietary data; skeptical of new federal boards generally.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrative, and bipartisan mechanics improve prospects, but many technical bills nonetheless stall in committee or face concern over conflicts and resource needs.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress transparency and conflict-of-interest safeguards.
Narrow, administrative, and bipartisan mechanics improve prospects, but many technical bills nonetheless stall in committee or face concern…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear statutory framework for a CBO-based advisory panel on health, with specific membership rules, defined duties, and an annual reporting and publication…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.