S. 1915 (119th)Bill Overview

Remove the Stain Act

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 22, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill rescinds every Medal of Honor awarded for actions at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890, and directs the relevant Secretaries to remove those recipients' names from the official Medal of Honor Rolls.

It states rescission is symbolic only: recipients are not required to return physical medals, and the legislation does not strip any federal benefits.

The bill includes findings describing the Wounded Knee engagement as a massacre of largely unarmed Lakota men, women, and children and cites tribal and organizational requests to revoke those awards.

Passage25/100

Symbolic, narrow remedy with low fiscal cost improves prospects, but political sensitivity about military honors and likely stakeholder opposition reduce odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill cleanly defines the problem and the substantive remedy (rescission of Medals of Honor for acts at Wounded Knee and removal from the Medal of Honor Roll). It specifies responsible actors and includes limited protective language (no return required; benefits unaffected), and it references existing statutory infrastructure (10 U.S.C. 1134a).

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize moral redress and tribal requests.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersFormally acknowledges historical injustice associated with the Wounded Knee Massacre.
  • Targeted stakeholdersResponds to tribal resolutions and intertribal requests to revoke medals tied to that engagement.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRemoves awards that supporters see as incompatible with the Medal of Honor's integrity.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a precedent for retroactively revoking military honors, inviting future challenges to awards.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be perceived as dishonoring descendants or unit histories tied to the original recipients.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould generate legal challenges about congressional authority to rescind awards and associated litigation costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize moral redress and tribal requests.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive; views the bill as a necessary symbolic correction honoring Native American pleas and restoring integrity to the Medal of Honor.

Sees rescission as acknowledgment of historical atrocity and a step toward reconciliation.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously receptive but cautious; recognizes moral basis for rescission while seeking clear legal process and minimized harm to families or current military morale.

Prefers procedural review and safeguards against broad precedent.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed; views the bill as retroactively judging soldiers and diminishing military honors.

Concerned about politicizing historical events and undermining deference to military awards and personnel.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood25/100

Symbolic, narrow remedy with low fiscal cost improves prospects, but political sensitivity about military honors and likely stakeholder opposition reduce odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of support or opposition from veterans and military organizations
  • Whether Armed Services Committee will prioritize and report the bill
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize moral redress and tribal requests.

Symbolic, narrow remedy with low fiscal cost improves prospects, but political sensitivity about military honors and likely stakeholder opp…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill cleanly defines the problem and the substantive remedy (rescission of Medals of Honor for acts at Wounded Knee and removal from the Medal of Honor Roll). It specifies…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis