S. 1940 (119th)Bill Overview

READY Accounts Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Creates a new tax-advantaged account called a Residential Emergency Asset-accumulation Deferred Taxation Yield (READY) account. Individuals may deduct up to $4,500 (inflation-adjusted) of cash contributions annually and take tax-free distributions for certified home disaster mitigation or uninsured disaster recovery expenses for their principal residence.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes equity and renter exclusion concerns

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified statutory framework for establishing a new tax-advantaged account targeted at home disaster mitigation and recovery.

Creates a new tax-advantaged account called a Residential Emergency Asset-accumulation Deferred Taxation Yield (READY) account.

Individuals may deduct up to $4,500 (inflation-adjusted) of cash contributions annually and take tax-free distributions for certified home disaster mitigation or uninsured disaster recovery expenses for their principal residence.

The bill sets trustee, investment, certification, rollover, reporting, and penalty rules, adds related excise and prohibited-transaction rules, and applies to taxable years after enactment.

Passage45/100

Moderate chance: administrable and narrowly targeted, with cross-cutting appeal; revenue impact and need for broader agreement reduce probability.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified statutory framework for establishing a new tax-advantaged account targeted at home disaster mitigation and recovery. The statute includes detailed tax mechanics, definitions, penalties, and broad regulatory authority for the Secretary and integrates thoroughly with existing Code provisions.

Contention48/100

Liberal emphasizes equity and renter exclusion concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Homebuyers · Local governmentsFederal agencies · Renters

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • HomebuyersEncourages homeowners to save and invest in disaster mitigation and repairs with tax-deductible contributions.
  • Potential benefitTax deductions reduce taxable income for contributors, increasing after-tax resources available for mitigation.
  • Local governmentsMay stimulate demand for construction, roofing, elevation, and retrofit services, supporting local jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal revenues through deductions and untaxed distributions, increasing budgetary costs.
  • Potential burdenImplementation creates regulatory and administrative burdens for IRS, trustees, and certifying professionals.
  • RentersBenefits primarily homeowners who can save, potentially excluding renters and low-income households.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes equity and renter exclusion concerns
Progressive70%

Generally supportive of measures that increase household resilience and reduce disaster harm, but concerned about distributional fairness.

Sees READY accounts as useful for mitigation and recovery but worries renters and low-income homeowners benefit less.

Wants safeguards to ensure benefits reach vulnerable communities and that certification and administrative rules do not create barriers.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Sees the bill as a pragmatic incentive to boost household resilience and reduce fiscal disaster exposure, but flags cost, complexity, and potential for abuse.

Wants clearer definitions, budget scoring, and administrative guardrails to limit fraud and ensure efficient implementation.

Split reaction
Conservative40%

Mixed to skeptical: welcomes incentives for private investment in home resilience but objects to expanding targeted tax expenditures and regulatory complexity.

Prefers market-driven or state-level solutions and worries about federal overreach, audit exposure, and benefits flowing disproportionately to higher-income homeowners.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Moderate chance: administrable and narrowly targeted, with cross-cutting appeal; revenue impact and need for broader agreement reduce probability.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No CBO/score provided to show fiscal cost
  • Standards and certification details left to Treasury/FEMA regulation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes equity and renter exclusion concerns

Moderate chance: administrable and narrowly targeted, with cross-cutting appeal; revenue impact and need for broader agreement reduce proba…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified statutory framework for establishing a new tax-advantaged account targeted at home disaster mitigation and recovery. The statute includes detailed…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis