- Potential benefitRemoves cost barriers to hepatitis C treatment for covered populations, increasing patient access to curative therapies.
- Potential benefitA subscription procurement model may lower per-course drug costs through bulk guaranteed purchases.
- Potential benefitTargeted grants and outreach could increase screening, diagnosis, and linkage to care among high-risk groups.
Cure Hepatitis C Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Establishes a Hepatitis C Elimination Program at HHS with a national strategy, advisory committee, interagency working group, public dashboard, and annual reports. Creates a 5-year subscription purchasing program for direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C drugs to provide no-cost treatment to defined covered populations.
Progressives emphasize equity and elimination; conservatives emphasize federal cost and procurement overreach.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal that combines statutory program creation, funding, procurement authority, and modifications to existing benefit and drug-pricing law to expand access to hepatitis C treatment for defined populations.
Establishes a Hepatitis C Elimination Program at HHS with a national strategy, advisory committee, interagency working group, public dashboard, and annual reports.
Creates a 5-year subscription purchasing program for direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C drugs to provide no-cost treatment to defined covered populations.
Authorizes grants to states, community providers, correctional systems, tribal and safety-net programs, funds point-of-care testing development, and eliminates Medicare Part D cost-sharing for hepatitis C antivirals for plan years 2027–2031.
Policy is technically focused and non-ideological, aiding support, but multi‑billion appropriations and drug program changes raise barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal that combines statutory program creation, funding, procurement authority, and modifications to existing benefit and drug-pricing law to expand access to hepatitis C treatment for defined populations.
Progressives emphasize equity and elimination; conservatives emphasize federal cost and procurement overreach.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesTotal appropriations authorize roughly $9.78 billion through 2031, increasing federal discretionary spending.
- Potential burdenProhibiting 340B use for program drugs may reduce program revenues or disrupt safety-net providers' financial models.
- Potential burdenAdministrative requirements, registration, and audit provisions could impose compliance burdens on pharmacies and provi…
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize equity and elimination; conservatives emphasize federal cost and procurement overreach.
Likely strongly supportive: treats hepatitis C as a preventable, curable public-health problem and removes financial barriers for vulnerable groups.
Values funding for elimination, incarcerated people, uninsured, tribal programs, and Medicare cost-sharing removal.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports a measurable elimination plan and price-leveraging subscription buys, while wary of fiscal costs, implementation complexity, and state uptake.
Wants performance oversight and clarity on interactions with existing programs.
Skeptical or opposed: critiques center on federal spending, procurement centralization, and expanded federal involvement in drug purchasing and distribution.
Some support possible for targeted public-safety benefits, like treating incarcerated individuals.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Policy is technically focused and non-ideological, aiding support, but multi‑billion appropriations and drug program changes raise barriers.
- No CBO score or formal cost estimate included
- Manufacturer willingness to accept subscription bids unknown
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize equity and elimination; conservatives emphasize federal cost and procurement overreach.
Policy is technically focused and non-ideological, aiding support, but multi‑billion appropriations and drug program changes raise barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy proposal that combines statutory program creation, funding, procurement authority, and modifications to existing benefit and drug-pri…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.