S. 1964 (119th)Bill Overview

Solid American Hardwood Tax Credit Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to add a new tax credit category for "natural carbon sink" expenditures on a taxpayer’s principal residence, defined as certain U.S.-grown deciduous hardwood products, and extends the related home improvement credit period to 2035. It also terminates the application of an increased tax credit (section 45Q(1)) for carbon capture equipment whose construction begins after enactment.

Why people may split

Progressives stress sustainability and opposes ending 45Q increases

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted tax-law amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates into the Internal Revenue Code by adding definitions and conforming edits.

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to add a new tax credit category for "natural carbon sink" expenditures on a taxpayer’s principal residence, defined as certain U.S.-grown deciduous hardwood products, and extends the related home improvement credit period to 2035.

It also terminates the application of an increased tax credit (section 45Q(1)) for carbon capture equipment whose construction begins after enactment.

Amendments apply to property placed in service or construction begun after enactment.

Passage30/100

Narrow industry-focused carve-out plus terminating a separate clean-technology credit creates competing constituency pressures and uncertain fiscal posture.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted tax-law amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates into the Internal Revenue Code by adding definitions and conforming edits. It specifies eligible materials and basic eligibility conditions and sets effective dates, but it omits fiscal impact information, procedural verification mechanisms, and explicit oversight/reporting provisions.

Contention72/100

Progressives stress sustainability and opposes ending 45Q increases

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
HomebuyersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEncourages use of wood in homes, potentially storing carbon long-term in residential materials.
  • HomebuyersExtends residential retrofit tax incentives through 2035, offering longer planning horizon for homeowners and suppliers.
  • Potential benefitStimulates renovation spending on qualifying materials, potentially increasing construction and retail activity.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExpands tax expenditures, likely reducing federal revenue available for other programs.
  • Potential burdenMay incentivize additional timber harvesting, risking unsustainable forestry without conservation safeguards.
  • Potential burdenTerminates the enhanced Section 45Q benefit for new carbon capture projects, reducing CCS financial incentives.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress sustainability and opposes ending 45Q increases
Progressive45%

Mixed reaction.

Supports incentives for storing carbon in building materials and domestic manufacturing, but worried about sustainability standards and the bill’s removal of increased 45Q credit for carbon capture.

Concerned the bill lacks forestry sustainability safeguards and may unintentionally encourage harmful logging practices.

Split reaction
Centrist65%

Cautiously supportive if structured and fiscally constrained.

Values domestic job support and carbon-storage co-benefits, but wants safeguards, cost estimates, and continuity for other decarbonization tools like 45Q.

Sees room for compromise on sustainability verification and budget limits.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Generally favorable.

Likes supporting U.S. timber industry, domestic sourcing, and homeowner tax incentives.

Views termination of increased 45Q credit as removing a corporate subsidy.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow industry-focused carve-out plus terminating a separate clean-technology credit creates competing constituency pressures and uncertain fiscal posture.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Net fiscal score and revenue impact are not provided
  • Stakeholder responses from timber, manufacturing, and CCUS industries
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress sustainability and opposes ending 45Q increases

Narrow industry-focused carve-out plus terminating a separate clean-technology credit creates competing constituency pressures and uncertai…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted tax-law amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates into the Internal Revenue Code by adding definitions and conforming edits. It specifies…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis