Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S336-337)
This bill amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act to allow holders of federal grazing permits or leases to temporarily use vacant grazing allotments when their assigned allotments are rendered unusable by extreme natural events or disasters. Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior may authorize temporary use, set terms considering ecological conditions and prior terms, permit temporary rangeland improvements, coordinate across agencies, and must issue guidelines within one year and periodically evaluate land health.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal safeguards.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to FLPMA that creates a new temporary-use authority for vacant grazing allotments during specified natural events and supplies substantial operational detail (actors, conditions, terms considerations, coordination, and a guideline deadline).
This bill amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act to allow holders of federal grazing permits or leases to temporarily use vacant grazing allotments when their assigned allotments are rendered unusable by extreme natural events or disasters.
Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior may authorize temporary use, set terms considering ecological conditions and prior terms, permit temporary rangeland improvements, coordinate across agencies, and must issue guidelines within one year and periodically evaluate land health.
Narrow, administratively focused change with built-in safeguards makes enactment plausible, but regional controversies and Senate procedure create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to FLPMA that creates a new temporary-use authority for vacant grazing allotments during specified natural events and supplies substantial operational detail (actors, conditions, terms considerations, coordination, and a guideline deadline).
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal safeguards.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal safeguards.
Likely cautious to skeptical.
Supportive of disaster relief for small operators, but concerned about environmental, wildlife, and tribal protections that the text does not fully specify.
Pragmatic and cautiously supportive if safeguards are concrete.
Views the bill as a reasonable administrative tool provided guidelines, monitoring, and clear timelines minimize conflicts and ecological harm.
Generally favorable.
Sees the bill as practical relief for ranchers, adding needed flexibility and resilience on public lands while retaining original permit rights.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administratively focused change with built-in safeguards makes enactment plausible, but regional controversies and Senate procedure create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize environmental and tribal safeguards.
Narrow, administratively focused change with built-in safeguards makes enactment plausible, but regional controversies and Senate procedure…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to FLPMA that creates a new temporary-use authority for vacant grazing allotments during specified natural events and supplies subs…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.