Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
The bill requires heads of Executive agencies to relocate at least 30% of headquarters employees to duty stations outside the Washington metropolitan area within one year, adjust pay locality to the new locations, and prohibit those relocated from full-time telework. It directs OMB to reduce federal headquarters real property by at least 30%, prioritize selling buildings and co‑locating agencies, mandates new workforce reporting in agency budget justifications, disallows relocation incentives in certain circumstances, and expressly supersedes other laws and collective bargaining agreements.
Progressives emphasize worker pay, telework, and bargaining harms
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes substantive obligations for Executive agencies to decentralize headquarters staff and reduce headquarters real property, with specific numerical targets, timelines, definitional clarity, and reporting requirements; however, it provides limited discussion of costs, sparse operational guidance for large-scale personnel and facilities changes, and no explicit enforcement or funding provisions.
The bill requires heads of Executive agencies to relocate at least 30% of headquarters employees to duty stations outside the Washington metropolitan area within one year, adjust pay locality to the new locations, and prohibit those relocated from full-time telework.
It directs OMB to reduce federal headquarters real property by at least 30%, prioritize selling buildings and co‑locating agencies, mandates new workforce reporting in agency budget justifications, disallows relocation incentives in certain circumstances, and expressly supersedes other laws and collective bargaining agreements.
Exceptions are provided for specified national security positions and employees with ADA-approved full-time telework accommodations; the Act also bars private causes of action challenging agency actions under the law.
Ambitious, controversial administrative mandate with fiscal consequences and limited compromise features makes enactment unlikely on content alone.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes substantive obligations for Executive agencies to decentralize headquarters staff and reduce headquarters real property, with specific numerical targets, timelines, definitional clarity, and reporting requirements; however, it provides limited discussion of costs, sparse operational guidance for large-scale personnel and facilities changes, and no explicit enforcement or funding provisions.
Progressives emphasize worker pay, telework, and bargaining harms
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize worker pay, telework, and bargaining harms
Likely skeptical and broadly opposed due to worker impact and diminished collective bargaining protections.
Support for decentralizing federal presence is tempered by concerns about pay reductions, telework loss, rapid timelines, and superseding employee agreements.
Mixed view: pragmatic interest in reducing DC concentration and realizing efficiencies, coupled with caution about operational risks and costs.
Would press for phased implementation, clear cost estimates, and protections to maintain service continuity.
Generally favorable toward decentralization, shrinking Washington's bureaucratic concentration, and reducing federal real estate.
Sees this as efficiency, accountability, and alignment with 'drain the swamp' rhetoric, while noting implementation should preserve mission‑critical functions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Ambitious, controversial administrative mandate with fiscal consequences and limited compromise features makes enactment unlikely on content alone.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize worker pay, telework, and bargaining harms
Ambitious, controversial administrative mandate with fiscal consequences and limited compromise features makes enactment unlikely on conten…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes substantive obligations for Executive agencies to decentralize headquarters staff and reduce headquarters real property, with specific numerical t…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.