Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
The bill requires abortion providers to offer patients an informed-consent form giving options to take fetal tissue or release it to the provider. If the patient releases tissue, providers must inter or cremate fetal remains within seven days, and may bury/cremate multiple remains collectively.
Progressives emphasize chilling effect and criminalization risks
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory enactment that is reasonably specific about the principal legal requirements (consent options, disposal timing and methods, reporting, and penalties).
The bill requires abortion providers to offer patients an informed-consent form giving options to take fetal tissue or release it to the provider.
If the patient releases tissue, providers must inter or cremate fetal remains within seven days, and may bury/cremate multiple remains collectively.
It imposes a civil penalty up to $50,000 for failing to keep consent documentation and criminal fines and up to five years' imprisonment for failing to dispose properly.
High-controversy subject, criminal penalties, and modest compromise features make enactment unlikely absent major chamber shifts or broad bipartisan deal.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory enactment that is reasonably specific about the principal legal requirements (consent options, disposal timing and methods, reporting, and penalties). It integrates into existing law at a structural level but leaves several implementation, resourcing, and procedural details unspecified.
Progressives emphasize chilling effect and criminalization risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize chilling effect and criminalization risks
Likely views the bill as a regulatory and criminalized imposition that stigmatizes abortion and risks chilling care.
Concern will focus on provider criminalization, reporting and privacy, and potential reductions in abortion access.
Some may acknowledge the stated intent to treat fetal remains respectfully but see harms outweighing benefits.
Mixed view: the bill's respectful framing has public appeal, but centrist actors will worry about enforcement, privacy, and unintended access impacts.
They will weigh transparency and dignity goals against criminalization and federal standardization over state rules.
Would seek narrow fixes to reduce burdens while preserving core intent.
Likely supportive, seeing the bill as protecting dignity and holding providers accountable.
Viewed as a pro-life measure that imposes moral and legal duties on clinics.
Some conservatives might still prefer stronger requirements or worry about federal overreach into state death/marriage/remains law, but overall positive.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
High-controversy subject, criminal penalties, and modest compromise features make enactment unlikely absent major chamber shifts or broad bipartisan deal.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize chilling effect and criminalization risks
High-controversy subject, criminal penalties, and modest compromise features make enactment unlikely absent major chamber shifts or broad b…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory enactment that is reasonably specific about the principal legal requirements (consent options, disposal timing and methods, reporting, and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.