S. 252 (119th)Bill Overview

GOOD Act

Government Operations and Politics|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresGovernment information and archives
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Guidance Out Of Darkness (GOOD) Act requires federal agencies to publish all current and future "guidance documents" in a single internet location designated by the OMB Director. It defines "guidance document" broadly (including memoranda, bulletins, speeches, blog posts, and no-action letters), mandates publishing existing guidance within 180 days, requires agency websites to link prominently to the centralized repository, preserves FOIA exemptions, and requires rescinded guidance to remain available with rescission details and court-case information if applicable.

Why people may split

Progressive fears chilling informal agency assistance; conservatives see constraint as accountability.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and supplies multiple specific mechanisms (definitions, publication timing, centralized repository, treatment of rescinded documents) suitable for an administrative/operational statute.

The Guidance Out Of Darkness (GOOD) Act requires federal agencies to publish all current and future "guidance documents" in a single internet location designated by the OMB Director.

It defines "guidance document" broadly (including memoranda, bulletins, speeches, blog posts, and no-action letters), mandates publishing existing guidance within 180 days, requires agency websites to link prominently to the centralized repository, preserves FOIA exemptions, and requires rescinded guidance to remain available with rescission details and court-case information if applicable.

Passage40/100

Relatively narrow administrative transparency bill with low fiscal impact—plausible to pass if framed as nonpartisan, but procedural objections and agency resistance create uncertainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and supplies multiple specific mechanisms (definitions, publication timing, centralized repository, treatment of rescinded documents) suitable for an administrative/operational statute. It integrates with key existing statutes (FOIA and definitions in title 5).

Contention65/100

Progressive fears chilling informal agency assistance; conservatives see constraint as accountability.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases public transparency by consolidating guidance in a single, searchable online location.
  • Federal agenciesMakes it easier for regulated parties to find and follow agency interpretations and expectations.
  • Potential benefitCould reduce hidden or informal regulatory direction, improving regulatory accountability.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates administrative and IT costs for agencies to inventory, publish, and maintain extensive guidance archives.
  • Potential burdenMay chill informal internal communications if many document types become broadly publicized.
  • Potential burdenThe broad definition of guidance could blur lines between guidance and binding rules, prompting litigation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive fears chilling informal agency assistance; conservatives see constraint as accountability.
Progressive50%

Likely cautiously supportive of more transparency but concerned about unintended limits on agencies' capacity to provide informal technical assistance.

Worries include chilling informal guidance, added administrative burden, and potential weaponization to block progressive policy via procedural avenues.

Split reaction
Centrist70%

Generally favorable to increasing transparency and predictability, while cautious about implementation costs and technical feasibility.

Would seek practical safeguards and phased funding to avoid operational disruption at agencies.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive as a measure to expose and constrain so-called 'secret law' and agency policymaking outside notice-and-comment rulemaking.

Views centralized publication as increased accountability and reduced regulatory overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Relatively narrow administrative transparency bill with low fiscal impact—plausible to pass if framed as nonpartisan, but procedural objections and agency resistance create uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or appropriation for implementation
  • Scope disputes over what counts as a 'guidance document'
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive fears chilling informal agency assistance; conservatives see constraint as accountability.

Relatively narrow administrative transparency bill with low fiscal impact—plausible to pass if framed as nonpartisan, but procedural object…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines its purpose and supplies multiple specific mechanisms (definitions, publication timing, centralized repository, treatment of rescinded documents) suit…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis