Held at the desk.
The bill directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish and annually update an online list of entities holding FCC licenses or authorizations that have certain foreign ownership or control by entities from 'covered countries' as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(f)(2). It requires the FCC to publish an initial list within 120 days for certain license types, complete a rulemaking within 18 months to identify other affected licensees, add those entities within one year after the rules, and exempts the FCC’s information collection under this section from the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Progressive wants stronger enforcement beyond publication.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that specifies scope, deadlines, and legal references for the FCC to publish and maintain a list of Commission-authorized entities with certain foreign ownership ties.
The bill directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish and annually update an online list of entities holding FCC licenses or authorizations that have certain foreign ownership or control by entities from 'covered countries' as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(f)(2).
It requires the FCC to publish an initial list within 120 days for certain license types, complete a rulemaking within 18 months to identify other affected licensees, add those entities within one year after the rules, and exempts the FCC’s information collection under this section from the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Administrative, limited-impact national security transparency bill with modest industry concerns; plausible to pass but not assured without negotiations.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that specifies scope, deadlines, and legal references for the FCC to publish and maintain a list of Commission-authorized entities with certain foreign ownership ties. It reasonably integrates with existing law and sets an implementable timetable, while delegating operational detail to the agency.
Progressive wants stronger enforcement beyond publication.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressive wants stronger enforcement beyond publication.
Likely supportive on national security and transparency grounds, viewing the bill as a modest step to expose foreign-adversary influence in U.S. communications infrastructure.
May want stronger enforcement or restrictions beyond publication, and will watch whether the list leads to remedial action against risky ownership.
Generally supportive of transparency for national-security reasons but cautious about implementation details and costs.
Wants accurate, narrowly tailored rules, clear definitions, and procedural safeguards to prevent errors and unintended harms to legitimate businesses.
Likely supportive because it targets influence from strategic competitors and increases national-security transparency.
Some conservatives may nonetheless worry about federal overreach, burdens on businesses, and unintended consequences for U.S. competitiveness.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Administrative, limited-impact national security transparency bill with modest industry concerns; plausible to pass but not assured without negotiations.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressive wants stronger enforcement beyond publication.
Administrative, limited-impact national security transparency bill with modest industry concerns; plausible to pass but not assured without…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that specifies scope, deadlines, and legal references for the FCC to publish and maintain a list of Commission-authorized entiti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.