S. 265 (119th)Bill Overview

Freedom from Government Surveys Act

Government Operations and Politics|Census and government statisticsGovernment Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Title 13 to make the American Community Survey (ACS) voluntary by removing penalties for failing to answer ACS questions and requires the Secretary to include a clear statement on the ACS that participation is voluntary.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize harms to vulnerable communities from worse data

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that clearly articulates and effects a specific change to Title 13: it exempts American Community Survey respondents from the mandatory-answer provision and requires a voluntary-participation notice on the survey.

The bill amends Title 13 to make the American Community Survey (ACS) voluntary by removing penalties for failing to answer ACS questions and requires the Secretary to include a clear statement on the ACS that participation is voluntary.

Passage35/100

Narrow but ideologically charged change; lacks compromise features and faces practical objections from agencies and jurisdictions.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that clearly articulates and effects a specific change to Title 13: it exempts American Community Survey respondents from the mandatory-answer provision and requires a voluntary-participation notice on the survey. The primary mechanics are stated by direct amendment of statutory sections, but implementation, fiscal, and oversight details are sparse.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize harms to vulnerable communities from worse data

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies · Housing market

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEliminates criminal or civil penalties for refusing ACS questions, removing legal consequences for nonresponse.
  • Potential benefitAffirms and clarifies that ACS participation is voluntary, requiring notice on survey materials.
  • Potential benefitReduces perceived government intrusion and potential privacy concerns among respondents.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenLikely reduces ACS response rates, degrading small-area demographic and socioeconomic estimates.
  • Federal agenciesWeakens data used to allocate federal and state program funds and formulas.
  • Housing marketCompromises public health, housing, transportation, and emergency planning reliant on ACS data.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize harms to vulnerable communities from worse data
Progressive10%

Likely to oppose the bill overall.

Supporters of strong data-driven social policy will view making the ACS voluntary as harming the accuracy of data used to allocate resources to vulnerable communities.

Likely resistant
Centrist45%

Mixed view: sympathetic to concerns about compulsory penalties, but worried about degraded data quality.

Would look for mitigation, evaluation, and costed alternatives before endorsing.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Generally supportive: views this as limiting federal overreach and protecting individual freedom from mandatory government surveys.

Sees removal of penalties as restoring personal liberty.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow but ideologically charged change; lacks compromise features and faces practical objections from agencies and jurisdictions.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost or impact estimate in text
  • Likely effects on ACS response rates and data quality
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize harms to vulnerable communities from worse data

Narrow but ideologically charged change; lacks compromise features and faces practical objections from agencies and jurisdictions.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that clearly articulates and effects a specific change to Title 13: it exempts American Community Survey respondents from the mandato…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis