S. 277 (119th)Bill Overview

A bill to release a Federal reversionary interest and convey mineral interests in Chester County, Tennessee, and for other purposes.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Forests, forestry, treesLand transfers
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 207.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to release a federal reversionary interest and to convey any United States mineral interest in a roughly 0.62-acre parcel of Chickasaw State Forest in Chester County, Tennessee, to the State of Tennessee. Both the reversionary interest release and the mineral conveyance are to occur without consideration, appraisal, environmental review, or exploratory mineral testing; Tennessee must pay any administrative costs the United States incurs.

Why people may split

Liberals worry waiver of environmental review; conservatives prioritize local control

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive conveyance that is clearly justified, legally specific, and integrated with existing law.

This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to release a federal reversionary interest and to convey any United States mineral interest in a roughly 0.62-acre parcel of Chickasaw State Forest in Chester County, Tennessee, to the State of Tennessee.

Both the reversionary interest release and the mineral conveyance are to occur without consideration, appraisal, environmental review, or exploratory mineral testing; Tennessee must pay any administrative costs the United States incurs.

Passage80/100

Very narrow, low-cost, administratively straightforward bill with low political salience; waivers of review are the main potential friction.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive conveyance that is clearly justified, legally specific, and integrated with existing law. It prescribes concrete actions for the Secretary of Agriculture and conditions those actions on administrative cost payment by the State.

Contention20/100

Liberals worry waiver of environmental review; conservatives prioritize local control

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsResolves local encroachment dispute and clears title for the 0.62-acre Chickasaw State Forest parcel.
  • Local governmentsTransfers mineral rights to Tennessee, enabling state control and potential local resource management.
  • Federal agenciesAvoids lengthy federal appraisal and environmental review, speeding conveyance and reducing administrative delay.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesConveys mineral interests without appraisal, risking loss of unknown federal mineral revenue.
  • Potential burdenWaives environmental and similar reviews, potentially allowing unassessed environmental impacts.
  • Potential burdenProvides quitclaim deed without warranty, shifting title risks and potential liabilities to Tennessee.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals worry waiver of environmental review; conservatives prioritize local control
Progressive60%

Likely accepting of resolving a narrow land-title encroachment but cautious about waiving environmental and appraisal reviews.

Concerned about precedent for removing oversight and about potential environmental or public-value losses from unassessed mineral conveyance.

Split reaction
Centrist80%

A pragmatic fix for a small, localized issue; the state takes administrative costs, reducing federal burden.

Supports the bill if safeguards limit precedent and clarify that the waiver applies only to this parcel.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable: returns land control and mineral interests to Tennessee, reduces federal oversight, and resolves a minor encroachment.

Sees this as appropriate local decisionmaking and reduced federal footprint.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Very narrow, low-cost, administratively straightforward bill with low political salience; waivers of review are the main potential friction.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate provided
  • Unknown subsurface mineral value and commercial interest
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals worry waiver of environmental review; conservatives prioritize local control

Very narrow, low-cost, administratively straightforward bill with low political salience; waivers of review are the main potential friction.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive conveyance that is clearly justified, legally specific, and integrated with existing law. It prescribes concrete actions for the Secr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis