- StudentsIncreases student parents' access to affordable child care, likely improving college retention and completion.
- Federal agenciesDirects federal funding to campus child care operations, supporting early childhood staff and administrative positions.
- StudentsSubsidized sliding-fee models reduce out-of-pocket costs for low-income student parents.
CCAMPIS Reauthorization Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
This bill reauthorizes and revises the Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) program under the Higher Education Act. It authorizes $500 million per year for FY2026–2031 for grants (minimum $75,000, maximum $2,000,000 annually) to eligible institutions to provide subsidized campus-based or contracted child care and related supports for student parents, establishes application, reporting, quality, and nondiscrimination requirements, and gives funding priority to programs leveraging local resources and serving single parents.
Budget size and federal spending magnitude
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive reauthorization and amendment of an existing federal grant program.
This bill reauthorizes and revises the Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) program under the Higher Education Act.
It authorizes $500 million per year for FY2026–2031 for grants (minimum $75,000, maximum $2,000,000 annually) to eligible institutions to provide subsidized campus-based or contracted child care and related supports for student parents, establishes application, reporting, quality, and nondiscrimination requirements, and gives funding priority to programs leveraging local resources and serving single parents.
Technocratic reauthorization with popular objectives but heavy authorization totals and some policy flashpoints lower probability absent appropriation clearances and bipartisan buy-in.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive reauthorization and amendment of an existing federal grant program. It provides clear purpose language, concrete grant mechanics (amounts, duration, permissible uses), detailed application and reporting requirements, priorities, and an explicit funding authorization.
Budget size and federal spending magnitude
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesAuthorizes $3.0–3.5 billion over six years, increasing federal spending obligations if appropriated.
- Potential burdenReporting, compliance, and quality-improvement requirements increase administrative burden for institutions.
- CitiesProhibition on construction may limit capacity expansion and require reliance on existing facilities.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Budget size and federal spending magnitude
Likely strongly supportive.
The bill targets low-income student parents (Pell focus), expands funded childcare access on campuses, sets quality standards, and mandates outreach and nondiscrimination.
It aligns with priorities to improve college completion and equity for parents.
Generally supportive but pragmatic and cautious.
The program is a targeted federal investment with measurable reporting and quality goals, though implementation costs, administrative burden, and overlap with existing child care funding deserve scrutiny.
Skeptical and likely opposed or only conditionally supportive.
Concerns focus on expanded federal spending, ongoing bureaucracy, federal involvement in campus services, and potential crowding out of private childcare markets.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic reauthorization with popular objectives but heavy authorization totals and some policy flashpoints lower probability absent appropriation clearances and bipartisan buy-in.
- CBO cost estimate and score absent
- Whether appropriations will fund the authorized amounts
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Budget size and federal spending magnitude
Technocratic reauthorization with popular objectives but heavy authorization totals and some policy flashpoints lower probability absent ap…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive reauthorization and amendment of an existing federal grant program. It provides clear purpose language, concrete grant mechanics (amou…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.