Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 132.
The bill designates any consumer product containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite (defined as 10% or more by weight) as a banned hazardous product under the Consumer Product Safety Act. It exempts commercial or industrial uses not customarily sold to consumers and excludes products that qualify as drugs, devices, cosmetics, or foods (including meat, poultry, and egg products).
Progressives prioritize youth-safety benefits; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive prohibition by incorporating affected items into the CPSA's 'banned hazardous product' framework, provides concrete definitional elements (10% threshold; consumer product reference), and specifies narrow statutory carve-outs, but it omits fiscal, transitional, and detailed enforcement or compliance guidance.
The bill designates any consumer product containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite (defined as 10% or more by weight) as a banned hazardous product under the Consumer Product Safety Act.
It exempts commercial or industrial uses not customarily sold to consumers and excludes products that qualify as drugs, devices, cosmetics, or foods (including meat, poultry, and egg products).
The rule takes effect 90 days after enactment.
Targeted public-safety measure with limited fiscal impact has plausible path, but enforcement细ties and industry opposition reduce likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive prohibition by incorporating affected items into the CPSA's 'banned hazardous product' framework, provides concrete definitional elements (10% threshold; consumer product reference), and specifies narrow statutory carve-outs, but it omits fiscal, transitional, and detailed enforcement or compliance guidance.
Progressives prioritize youth-safety benefits; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives prioritize youth-safety benefits; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach.
Likely supportive overall as a public-health measure to reduce youth poisonings and intentional self-harm.
Views the numeric threshold and CPSC enforcement as practical tools to limit easy access to a lethal chemical while preserving essential food and industrial uses.
Generally favorable but pragmatic; sees this as a targeted safety regulation that needs clear implementation rules.
Wants evidence that restricting sales will reduce harm without imposing disproportionate compliance costs or unintended commerce disruptions.
Skeptical of federal intervention in product sales; views the bill as an expansion of regulatory authority that may burden small businesses and hobbyists.
Prefers narrower, state-driven, or market-based approaches to reduce misuse.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted public-safety measure with limited fiscal impact has plausible path, but enforcement细ties and industry opposition reduce likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives prioritize youth-safety benefits; conservatives emphasize regulatory overreach.
Targeted public-safety measure with limited fiscal impact has plausible path, but enforcement细ties and industry opposition reduce likelihoo…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive prohibition by incorporating affected items into the CPSA's 'banned hazardous product' framework, provides concrete definitional eleme…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.