Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill designates the mountain at Devils Tower National Monument in Wyoming by the official name "Devils Tower," supplying precise coordinates. It also states that any United States law, map, regulation, or record referring to that mountain or area will be deemed to refer to "Devils Tower."
Progressives emphasize Indigenous naming and historical justice.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-targeted commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the feature, provides coordinates, and supplies a deeming clause to bind existing references to the new designation.
The bill designates the mountain at Devils Tower National Monument in Wyoming by the official name "Devils Tower," supplying precise coordinates.
It also states that any United States law, map, regulation, or record referring to that mountain or area will be deemed to refer to "Devils Tower."
Very narrow administrative change with negligible fiscal impact; historically such naming bills usually pass absent localized controversy.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-targeted commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the feature, provides coordinates, and supplies a deeming clause to bind existing references to the new designation.
Progressives emphasize Indigenous naming and historical justice.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize Indigenous naming and historical justice.
Likely critical or cautious.
Supporters of Indigenous recognition may view the bill as a missed opportunity to recognize traditional names and histories.
Some progressives might accept it if paired with Tribal consultation or interpretive context.
Generally supportive but pragmatic.
Sees the bill as a low-cost, clarifying technical measure, while noting symbolic concerns about Indigenous naming should be handled sensitively and through consultation.
Likely strongly supportive.
Views the bill as a straightforward preservation of a longstanding, well-known place name and as avoiding unnecessary bureaucratic change or politicization.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow administrative change with negligible fiscal impact; historically such naming bills usually pass absent localized controversy.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize Indigenous naming and historical justice.
Very narrow administrative change with negligible fiscal impact; historically such naming bills usually pass absent localized controversy.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-targeted commemorative designation: it clearly identifies the feature, provides coordinates, and supplies a deeming clause to bind existing refe…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.