S. 315 (119th)Bill Overview

AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025

Science, Technology, Communications|Broadcasting, cable, digital technologiesCivil actions and liability
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 39.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with FEMA and the FCC, to issue a rule requiring AM-capable receivers be installed as standard equipment in new passenger motor vehicles sold or imported into the United States. The rule must make AM stations easily accessible to drivers, may be satisfied by digital audio AM receivers, and includes phased compliance deadlines with a longer timeline for small manufacturers.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize public safety and access for underserved communities

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed statutory mandate directing DOT to establish a national equipment requirement, with clear roles, timelines, enforcement hooks, regular reviews, and a GAO study; it leaves technical standards and many implementation specifics to delegated rulemaking.

The bill directs the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with FEMA and the FCC, to issue a rule requiring AM-capable receivers be installed as standard equipment in new passenger motor vehicles sold or imported into the United States.

The rule must make AM stations easily accessible to drivers, may be satisfied by digital audio AM receivers, and includes phased compliance deadlines with a longer timeline for small manufacturers.

The law preempts state rules on AM access, creates civil penalties and AG enforcement, mandates a GAO study on emergency alert dissemination (IPAWS), requires periodic reviews, and sunsets the rule authority after ten years.

Passage40/100

Relatively narrow, low-ideology public-safety mandate increases viability, but industry resistance to new equipment mandates and legislative calendar pressures reduce chances.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed statutory mandate directing DOT to establish a national equipment requirement, with clear roles, timelines, enforcement hooks, regular reviews, and a GAO study; it leaves technical standards and many implementation specifics to delegated rulemaking.

Contention55/100

Progressives emphasize public safety and access for underserved communities

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StatesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases emergency alert resilience by adding an over‑the‑air channel independent of cellular networks.
  • Potential benefitImproves public access to AM broadcasts, benefiting rural and disaster‑affected communities with limited internet servi…
  • StatesCreates predictable national standard, avoiding a patchwork of state rules for vehicle equipment.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdds manufacturing costs that may raise vehicle prices or shift production resources.
  • Potential burdenImposes compliance burdens on automakers, especially suppliers integrating legacy AM hardware.
  • Local governmentsFederal preemption removes state and local flexibility to set differing access or safety requirements.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public safety and access for underserved communities
Progressive80%

Likely supportive overall because the bill protects a resilient public-communications medium and strengthens emergency alert access, especially for rural and underserved communities.

Would press for strong accessibility, non-discrimination, and implementation that prioritizes public safety and local broadcasters.

May want assurances that marginalized communities benefit and that manufacturers do not charge extra fees.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious: supports improving emergency communications while wanting clear cost-benefit evidence and reasonable timelines.

Appreciates small-manufacturer relief and allowance for digital AM, but seeks rigorous GAO analysis and five-year reviews to adjust policy if needed.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Skeptical or opposed overall because it imposes a federal equipment mandate on automakers, expanding regulatory authority and increasing potential costs.

Acknowledges public-safety rationale but prefers market-based solutions or voluntary incentives instead of a nationwide mandate and preemption of state authority.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Relatively narrow, low-ideology public-safety mandate increases viability, but industry resistance to new equipment mandates and legislative calendar pressures reduce chances.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Automakers' willingness to accept mandated hardware costs
  • Regulatory pushback or lobbying intensity from industry groups
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public safety and access for underserved communities

Relatively narrow, low-ideology public-safety mandate increases viability, but industry resistance to new equipment mandates and legislativ…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed statutory mandate directing DOT to establish a national equipment requirement, with clear roles, timelines, enforcement hooks, regular reviews, and a GA…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis