S. 318 (119th)Bill Overview

ANCHOR Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Advanced technology and technological innovationsComputers and information technology
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Held at the desk.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

<p><strong>Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act or the ANCHOR Act&nbsp;</strong></p><p>This bill requires the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet (ARF).</p><p>ARF is comprised of U.S.-flagged vessels that provide at-sea laboratories where oceanographic scientists, educators, and students research and learn about marine science.&nbsp;</p><p>The bill requires the plan to include assessments of</p><ul><li>telecommunications and networking needs of ARF, consistent with typical scientific missions;</li><li>cybersecurity needs appropriate for the ownership of ARF vessels and their typical research functions;</li><li>the costs necessary to meet these needs; and</li><li>the time required to implement necessary upgrades.</li></ul><p>The plan must also include (1) a spending plan for the NSF, the Office of Naval Research, nonfederal&nbsp;owners of ARF vessels,&nbsp;and users of the vessels to cover identified costs; and (2) a proposal regarding the adoption of common solutions or&nbsp;consortial licensing agreements, or the centralization of cybersecurity, telecommunications, or data management at a single facility.&nbsp;</p><p>Among other factors specified in the bill, the&nbsp;NSF must consider the network capabilities necessary to meet mission needs (e.g., to upload data to shoreside servers), international standards and guidance for information security, and requirements for controlled unclassified or classified information.&nbsp;</p><p>The plan must be provided to Congress within one year of the bill's enactment.</p>

Why people may split

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Watch point

The next hurdle is reproducing that support in the other chamber.

<p><strong>Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act or the ANCHOR Act&nbsp;</strong></p><p>This bill requires the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet (ARF).</p><p>ARF is comprised of U.S.-flagged vessels that provide at-sea laboratories where oceanographic scientists, educators, and students research and learn about marine science.&nbsp;</p><p>The bill requires the plan to include assessments of</p><ul><li>telecommunications and networking needs of ARF, consistent with typical scientific missions;</li><li>cybersecurity needs appropriate for the ownership of ARF vessels and their typical research functions;</li><li>the costs necessary to meet these needs; and</li><li>the time required to implement necessary upgrades.</li></ul><p>The plan must also include (1) a spending plan for the NSF, the Office of Naval Research, nonfederal&nbsp;owners of ARF vessels,&nbsp;and users of the vessels to cover identified costs; and (2) a proposal regarding the adoption of common solutions or&nbsp;consortial licensing agreements, or the centralization of cybersecurity, telecommunications, or data management at a single facility.&nbsp;</p><p>Among other factors specified in the bill, the&nbsp;NSF must consider the network capabilities necessary to meet mission needs (e.g., to upload data to shoreside servers), international standards and guidance for information security, and requirements for controlled unclassified or classified information.&nbsp;</p><p>The plan must be provided to Congress within one year of the bill's enactment.</p>

Passage64/100

This bill has already passed one chamber, which is a stronger signal than introduction alone but still leaves another major hurdle ahead.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention62/100

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens0% / 100%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • No clear beneficiaries surfaced yet.
Likely burdened
  • No clear downsides surfaced yet.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.
Progressive

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
Centrist

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
Conservative

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood64/100

This bill has already passed one chamber, which is a stronger signal than introduction alone but still leaves another major hurdle ahead.

Why this could stall
  • The next hurdle is reproducing that support in the other chamber.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

This bill has already passed one chamber, which is a stronger signal than introduction alone but still leaves another major hurdle ahead.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for ANCHOR Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis