Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Creates the National Integrated Heat Health Information System (NIHHIS) within NOAA and an interagency NIHHIS Interagency Committee to coordinate federal extreme-heat preparedness, planning, data, research, and communication. Requires a 5-year strategic plan within two years, open data stewardship, consultation with Tribes and jurisdictions, and quarterly committee meetings.
Adequacy of funding: seen as too small by left, acceptable baseline by centrist.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that establishes organizational structures (NIHHIS and an interagency committee), provides membership and governance rules, requires a strategic plan with public reporting, and authorizes modest multi-year funding.
Creates the National Integrated Heat Health Information System (NIHHIS) within NOAA and an interagency NIHHIS Interagency Committee to coordinate federal extreme-heat preparedness, planning, data, research, and communication.
Requires a 5-year strategic plan within two years, open data stewardship, consultation with Tribes and jurisdictions, and quarterly committee meetings.
Authorizes $5,000,000 annually for NOAA for fiscal years 2025–2029 to support the program and committee activities.
Small appropriation, technical public-health purpose, and interagency consultation make enactment reasonably likely if prioritized.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that establishes organizational structures (NIHHIS and an interagency committee), provides membership and governance rules, requires a strategic plan with public reporting, and authorizes modest multi-year funding. It integrates with existing NOAA components and references relevant statutes.
Adequacy of funding: seen as too small by left, acceptable baseline by centrist.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Adequacy of funding: seen as too small by left, acceptable baseline by centrist.
Generally supportive: frames the bill as a necessary federal response to rising heat risks and public-health impacts.
Praises interagency coordination, Tribal consultation, open data, and a research focus, but views funding and concrete community protections as inadequate.
Cautiously supportive: welcomes a coordinated, low-cost federal effort to address extreme heat.
Sees merit in data sharing and a strategic plan, but wants clear metrics, oversight, and evidence of cost-effectiveness before expanding scope or funding.
Skeptical: concerned about creating federal bureaucracy and expanding NOAA's role into public health planning.
May accept forecasting and data-sharing elements but worries about mission creep, regulatory consequences, and recurring costs beyond the authorization.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small appropriation, technical public-health purpose, and interagency consultation make enactment reasonably likely if prioritized.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Adequacy of funding: seen as too small by left, acceptable baseline by centrist.
Small appropriation, technical public-health purpose, and interagency consultation make enactment reasonably likely if prioritized.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured administrative/operational measure that establishes organizational structures (NIHHIS and an interagency committee), provides membership and gove…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.