Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
The bill requires the President to impose sanctions on persons operating in Chinese economic sectors where they have engaged in a pattern of significant theft of U.S. intellectual property or received IP through such theft. Sanctions include IEEPA-based asset blocking, visa ineligibility and revocation for covered persons, criminal/administrative penalties, presidential waiver and termination authorities, and a 180-day reporting requirement to Congress.
Progressives stress protections for academic exchanges and noncomplicit family members
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a sanctions and immigration‑restriction regime aimed at actors engaged in repeated theft of U.S. intellectual property and leverages existing statutory authorities.
The bill requires the President to impose sanctions on persons operating in Chinese economic sectors where they have engaged in a pattern of significant theft of U.S. intellectual property or received IP through such theft.
Sanctions include IEEPA-based asset blocking, visa ineligibility and revocation for covered persons, criminal/administrative penalties, presidential waiver and termination authorities, and a 180-day reporting requirement to Congress.
Separately, the bill bars issuance of U.S. visas and admission for senior Chinese Communist Party officials, their spouses and children, PRC cabinet members, and active-duty People’s Liberation Army personnel, with an exception if the President certifies China has ceased sponsoring IP theft.
Bill is politically salient and administratively implementable, attracting potential bipartisan support, but veto risk, diplomatic fallout, and filibuster thresholds reduce likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a sanctions and immigration‑restriction regime aimed at actors engaged in repeated theft of U.S. intellectual property and leverages existing statutory authorities. It includes some accountability elements (reports, waiver/termination certifications) but leaves critical definitional, procedural, and resourcing details unspecified.
Progressives stress protections for academic exchanges and noncomplicit family members
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives stress protections for academic exchanges and noncomplicit family members
Generally supportive of stronger tools to stop theft of U.S. intellectual property and defend workers and innovators.
Concerned the bill’s visa restrictions (including spouses and children) and broad IEEPA authority could harm academic collaboration, humanitarian transactions, and non‑complicit individuals without clear due process and narrow targeting.
Supports the goal of deterring and penalizing systematic Chinese IP theft while seeking clearer legal standards and proportionality.
Wants precise definitions, robust interagency coordination, and oversight to limit unintended economic or diplomatic fallout.
Strongly favors robust measures to punish and deter PRC intellectual property theft, viewing asset blocks and visa bans as appropriate national security tools.
Likely to endorse aggressive implementation and limited tolerance for waivers except when clearly warranted.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Bill is politically salient and administratively implementable, attracting potential bipartisan support, but veto risk, diplomatic fallout, and filibuster thresholds reduce likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress protections for academic exchanges and noncomplicit family members
Bill is politically salient and administratively implementable, attracting potential bipartisan support, but veto risk, diplomatic fallout,…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a sanctions and immigration‑restriction regime aimed at actors engaged in repeated theft of U.S. intellectual property and leverages existing stat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.