S. 338 (119th)Bill Overview

Fred Korematsu Congressional Gold Medal Act of 2025

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues|AsiaCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 30, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill posthumously awards a single Congressional Gold Medal to Fred Korematsu in recognition of his civil rights leadership, patriotism, and dedication to justice. It directs the Secretary of the Treasury to strike the medal, gives the medal to the Smithsonian for display, authorizes bronze duplicates for sale to cover costs, and charges required minting expenses to the U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize civil-rights repudiation and moral redress.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative statute that clearly states its purpose, identifies responsible officials and institutions, and integrates with applicable statutory authorities for minting and disposition of medals.

This bill posthumously awards a single Congressional Gold Medal to Fred Korematsu in recognition of his civil rights leadership, patriotism, and dedication to justice.

It directs the Secretary of the Treasury to strike the medal, gives the medal to the Smithsonian for display, authorizes bronze duplicates for sale to cover costs, and charges required minting expenses to the U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

The bill includes findings recounting Korematsu’s life, legal history, and the wartime incarceration of Japanese Americans.

Passage90/100

Narrow, symbolic, low‑cost measure with strong bipartisan precedent and few implementation hurdles.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative statute that clearly states its purpose, identifies responsible officials and institutions, and integrates with applicable statutory authorities for minting and disposition of medals.

Contention15/100

Progressives emphasize civil-rights repudiation and moral redress.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitHonors Korematsu's role in civil rights, raising national awareness about wartime civil liberties abuses.
  • Potential benefitProvides a durable Smithsonian exhibit item available for research and public education.
  • Potential benefitReinforces historical lessons to policymakers and public about protecting constitutional rights during crises.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenLargely symbolic, producing no statutory changes, legal remedies, or new protections.
  • Potential burdenCosts charged to the U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund could reduce resources for other Mint priorities.
  • Potential burdenSelling bronze duplicates may be criticized as commercializing a civil rights commemoration.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil-rights repudiation and moral redress.
Progressive100%

Likely strongly supportive; views the medal as overdue symbolic redress and public education about wartime civil-rights violations.

Sees the bill as affirming civil liberties and warning against racialized national-security policies.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally supportive as a symbolic, low-cost bipartisan recognition of a civil-rights figure.

Views the bill as appropriate congressional acknowledgment, while noting symbolism does not substitute for policy changes.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely mostly supportive but with caveats; many conservatives will accept honoring Korematsu’s civil liberties stand, though some may worry about criticizing wartime government actions.

Emphasis on minimal cost and historical context matters.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Narrow, symbolic, low‑cost measure with strong bipartisan precedent and few implementation hurdles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate and House scheduling and floor time
  • Potential procedural holds or objections in either chamber
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil-rights repudiation and moral redress.

Narrow, symbolic, low‑cost measure with strong bipartisan precedent and few implementation hurdles.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative statute that clearly states its purpose, identifies responsible officials and institutions, and integrates with applicable statuto…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis