Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 6.
Amends CERCLA to reauthorize and expand EPA brownfields programs through 2030. Raises per-site cleanup grants from $500,000 to $1,000,000, increases state response program appropriations for FY2025–2030, and adjusts eligibility and application rules.
Support for higher funding versus concerns over increased federal spending
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment of CERCLA brownfields provisions that is precise in its textual changes and includes several concrete mechanisms (increased grant caps, eligibility changes, specific authorization amounts for state response programs, and a 1‑year reporting/guidance requirement).
Amends CERCLA to reauthorize and expand EPA brownfields programs through 2030.
Raises per-site cleanup grants from $500,000 to $1,000,000, increases state response program appropriations for FY2025–2030, and adjusts eligibility and application rules.
Adds community engagement scoring, eases matching requirements for small or disadvantaged areas, and explicitly includes Alaska Native regional and village corporations and certain nonprofit categories.
Targeted, bipartisan-friendly fixes to an existing program with modest authorized funding increases increase chances, but final enactment depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment of CERCLA brownfields provisions that is precise in its textual changes and includes several concrete mechanisms (increased grant caps, eligibility changes, specific authorization amounts for state response programs, and a 1‑year reporting/guidance requirement).
Support for higher funding versus concerns over increased federal spending
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support for higher funding versus concerns over increased federal spending
Generally favorable: expands funding, strengthens environmental justice access, and mandates community involvement.
Will watch implementation details and eligibility expansions for private or business interests closely.
Generally supportive of targeted brownfield funding and streamlining, with pragmatic concerns about cost, oversight, and clear implementation.
Will seek measurable safeguards and cost-effectiveness assurances.
Mixed to skeptical: supports reuse and economic development but worries about expanded federal spending, eligibility broadening, and potential for mission creep.
Prefers state/local solutions and tighter fiscal controls.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, bipartisan-friendly fixes to an existing program with modest authorized funding increases increase chances, but final enactment depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support for higher funding versus concerns over increased federal spending
Targeted, bipartisan-friendly fixes to an existing program with modest authorized funding increases increase chances, but final enactment d…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory reauthorization and amendment of CERCLA brownfields provisions that is precise in its textual changes and includes several concrete mechanisms…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.