Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 7.
Establishes a competitive EPA pilot grant program (Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Program) to fund recycling infrastructure and accessibility projects, prioritizing underserved communities and using a hub-and-spoke model. Requires EPA to collect and publish data and reports on recycling and composting capacity, develop national and state recycling estimates, inventory materials recovery facilities, study diversion from circular markets, and provides periodic federal reporting and GAO reports.
Liberal emphasizes environmental justice and expanded access
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive policy measure that establishes a time-bound pilot grant program, amends existing statute for data collection, and authorizes specific funding while embedding multiple reporting and oversight requirements.
Establishes a competitive EPA pilot grant program (Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Program) to fund recycling infrastructure and accessibility projects, prioritizing underserved communities and using a hub-and-spoke model.
Requires EPA to collect and publish data and reports on recycling and composting capacity, develop national and state recycling estimates, inventory materials recovery facilities, study diversion from circular markets, and provides periodic federal reporting and GAO reports.
Authorizes $30 million per year (FY2025–2029) for the pilot grants and $4 million per year (FY2025–2029) for data/reporting, with program details on grant size, priorities, prohibitions, and administrative limits.
Low-controversy, modestly funded technical program with reporting requirements favors passage, but ultimate outcome hinges on appropriations and legislative calendar.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive policy measure that establishes a time-bound pilot grant program, amends existing statute for data collection, and authorizes specific funding while embedding multiple reporting and oversight requirements.
Liberal emphasizes environmental justice and expanded access
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes environmental justice and expanded access
Generally favorable: funds infrastructure in underserved communities and mandates data collection to improve recycling systems.
Views investment and data as tools for environmental justice and strengthening circular economy capacity.
Cautiously supportive: appreciates targeted infrastructure and standardized data, but watches cost-effectiveness and program design.
Wants measurable outcomes, transparency, and reasonable federal-state balance.
Skeptical or somewhat opposed: sees well-intentioned goals but worries about federal spending, market distortion, and expanded EPA role.
Prefers state, local, and private solutions over new federal grant programs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-controversy, modestly funded technical program with reporting requirements favors passage, but ultimate outcome hinges on appropriations and legislative calendar.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes environmental justice and expanded access
Low-controversy, modestly funded technical program with reporting requirements favors passage, but ultimate outcome hinges on appropriation…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive policy measure that establishes a time-bound pilot grant program, amends existing statute for data collection, and authorizes specifi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.