- Potential benefitProvides Congress with standardized studies and plans to inform telework policy and oversight.
- Local governmentsMay reduce mistaken locality pay obligations for employees teleworking outside pay localities.
- Potential benefitCould curb underutilized leased real property and encourage more efficient facility use.
SHOW UP Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
The bill requires Executive agencies to reinstate telework policies, practices, and levels that existed on December 31, 2019, within 30 days. Agencies may not expand telework beyond those pre‑pandemic levels until, within 180 days, they submit to Congress a study of COVID‑era telework impacts, a plan for any expansion, and receive an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) certification that the plan improves mission performance, reduces real‑property and locality‑pay costs, addresses security and equipment needs, and does not substantially raise certain costs.
Liberal emphasizes worker flexibility, equity, and climate impacts versus conservative focus on accountability and cost savings.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused administrative/operational measure that prescribes specific actions, timelines, and reporting requirements to constrain and condition agency telework policy changes.
The bill requires Executive agencies to reinstate telework policies, practices, and levels that existed on December 31, 2019, within 30 days.
Agencies may not expand telework beyond those pre‑pandemic levels until, within 180 days, they submit to Congress a study of COVID‑era telework impacts, a plan for any expansion, and receive an Office of Personnel Management (OPM) certification that the plan improves mission performance, reduces real‑property and locality‑pay costs, addresses security and equipment needs, and does not substantially raise certain costs.
Agencies may revise and resubmit plans to obtain certification; uncertified plans cannot be implemented.
Relatively targeted but politically charged federal workforce mandate with modest fiscal signals; faces predictable partisan and stakeholder opposition in the Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused administrative/operational measure that prescribes specific actions, timelines, and reporting requirements to constrain and condition agency telework policy changes. It provides reasonably detailed content requirements for agency studies and a clear sequencing of obligations (reinstatement, study/plan submission, OPM certification).
Liberal emphasizes worker flexibility, equity, and climate impacts versus conservative focus on accountability and cost savings.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenReinstating pre‑pandemic policies could reduce employee flexibility and harm recruitment or retention.
- Potential burdenMay increase commuting time and out‑of‑pocket costs for employees returning to worksites.
- Potential burdenCould force agencies to maintain larger physical footprints, increasing facility and lease costs.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberal emphasizes worker flexibility, equity, and climate impacts versus conservative focus on accountability and cost savings.
Likely critical of the bill for rolling back telework flexibility gained during the pandemic and restricting future expansion until OPM certification.
Would view the reinstatement mandate as potentially harmful to worker flexibility, caregiving needs, equity, and emissions reduction, while acknowledging need for mission effectiveness and cybersecurity assessments.
Mixed view: supports evidence‑based review of telework impacts and security concerns but uneasy about the 30‑day reinstatement requirement and rigid precertification block on expansion.
Would favor careful, quantified studies and practical implementation timelines that balance mission needs, costs, and workforce flexibility.
Generally supportive because the bill restores pre‑pandemic workplace norms, prioritizes in‑person accountability, and demands cost‑saving and security justifications for expanded remote work.
Views the OPM certification requirement as a necessary control to prevent mission degradation and unnecessary expenses.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Relatively targeted but politically charged federal workforce mandate with modest fiscal signals; faces predictable partisan and stakeholder opposition in the Senate.
- Absent cost estimates or CBO score
- Level of stakeholder (union/agency) opposition
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberal emphasizes worker flexibility, equity, and climate impacts versus conservative focus on accountability and cost savings.
Relatively targeted but politically charged federal workforce mandate with modest fiscal signals; faces predictable partisan and stakeholde…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused administrative/operational measure that prescribes specific actions, timelines, and reporting requirements to constrain and condition agency telewor…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.