S. 375 (119th)Bill Overview

Transition-to-Success Mentoring Act

Education|Academic performance and assessmentsCongressional oversight
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Adds a new Transition-to-Success Mentoring Program to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The Secretary of Education awards up to 5-year grants to LEAs or LEA–nonprofit partnerships to establish or expand school-based mentoring for at-risk middle school students transitioning to high school.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes equity, trauma-informed care, and inclusion benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-specified statutory grant program within the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, with detailed programmatic definitions, required activities, and reporting metrics, but it omits appropriation/authorization language and several procedural and enforcement details necessary to fully operationalize the program without significant delegated rulemaking.

Adds a new Transition-to-Success Mentoring Program to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

The Secretary of Education awards up to 5-year grants to LEAs or LEA–nonprofit partnerships to establish or expand school-based mentoring for at-risk middle school students transitioning to high school.

Grants fund success coaches who develop individualized success plans, meet monthly with students, engage parents and school staff, provide college and career exploration, and require annual reporting and program evaluation.

Passage40/100

Strong bipartisan appeal and clear administrative design increase prospects, but unspecified funding and need for appropriations reduce immediate enactment chances.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-specified statutory grant program within the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, with detailed programmatic definitions, required activities, and reporting metrics, but it omits appropriation/authorization language and several procedural and enforcement details necessary to fully operationalize the program without significant delegated rulemaking.

Contention60/100

Left emphasizes equity, trauma-informed care, and inclusion benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Schools · StudentsLocal governments · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • SchoolsProvides individualized transition support, potentially reducing middle-to-high school dropout and improving academic c…
  • StudentsTargets high-poverty, high-crime, and rural schools, directing resources to students with greatest need.
  • Local governmentsEncourages career and postsecondary preparation via internships, job training, and partnerships with local businesses.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsFederal program standards could constrain local autonomy in designing mentoring approaches.
  • Federal agenciesCreates new federal spending obligations, requiring appropriations without specifying funding levels.
  • Local governmentsMay increase administrative and reporting burdens on local education agencies and nonprofits.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes equity, trauma-informed care, and inclusion benefits
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive: the bill targets high-poverty, high-crime, rural, and high-need schools and funds supports for at-risk youth.

It emphasizes equity, trauma-informed training, inclusion for students with disabilities, and postsecondary and career pathways.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but pragmatic: the bill focuses on targeted interventions and evaluation, which appeals to incremental improvement.

Concerns will center on cost-effectiveness, measurable outcomes, and administrative burden on districts.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Mixed to somewhat skeptical: values mentoring and local partnerships but wary of a new federal grant program, ongoing reporting mandates, and potential federal oversight of local schools.

May prefer state or local solutions and private-sector-led initiatives.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Strong bipartisan appeal and clear administrative design increase prospects, but unspecified funding and need for appropriations reduce immediate enactment chances.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No authorization of appropriations or funding levels specified
  • No cost estimate or CBO scoring included in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes equity, trauma-informed care, and inclusion benefits

Strong bipartisan appeal and clear administrative design increase prospects, but unspecified funding and need for appropriations reduce imm…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a well-specified statutory grant program within the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, with detailed programmatic definitions, required activities, and r…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis