Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit export or sale of petroleum products drawn from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to China, North Korea, Russia, Iran, or entities owned/controlled by those countries or by the Chinese Communist Party. The Secretary may waive the prohibition if certified as in U.S. national security interests.
Progressives emphasize preventing adversary benefit and transparency.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a targeted substantive prohibition and integrates that prohibition into the existing statutory framework, but it omits several implementation, fiscal, and accountability details that would ordinarily be expected for such a change.
Amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit export or sale of petroleum products drawn from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to China, North Korea, Russia, Iran, or entities owned/controlled by those countries or by the Chinese Communist Party.
The Secretary may waive the prohibition if certified as in U.S. national security interests.
The Secretary must issue a rule within 60 days; conforming and clerical amendments update statutory cross-references and table of contents.
Legislatively modest and administratively implementable, but geopolitical sensitivity and competing priorities reduce odds of enactment absent strong bipartisan momentum.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a targeted substantive prohibition and integrates that prohibition into the existing statutory framework, but it omits several implementation, fiscal, and accountability details that would ordinarily be expected for such a change.
Progressives emphasize preventing adversary benefit and transparency.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize preventing adversary benefit and transparency.
Likely supportive overall because the bill blocks strategically important U.S. energy resources from authoritarian adversaries and reinforces sanctions.
They would watch the waiver closely and seek tight limits and transparency to prevent circumvention.
Generally favorable but cautious; sees the bill as a focused national-security measure consistent with sanctions, while noting implementation, legal definitions, and market impacts need clarity.
Would prefer clearer waiver standards and coordination with allies.
Likely supportive on national-security grounds because it restricts adversaries' access to U.S. strategic oil.
Some conservatives will caution against constraining executive flexibility to use SPR for market or diplomatic leverage.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Legislatively modest and administratively implementable, but geopolitical sensitivity and competing priorities reduce odds of enactment absent strong bipartisan momentum.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize preventing adversary benefit and transparency.
Legislatively modest and administratively implementable, but geopolitical sensitivity and competing priorities reduce odds of enactment abs…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a targeted substantive prohibition and integrates that prohibition into the existing statutory framework, but it omits several implementation, fis…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.